User talk:Lndpunjab

December 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Hunjan, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sikh-History 09:25, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Kalsi. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sikh-History 09:30, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Ghatorhe. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sikh-History 09:33, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Panesar, you will be blocked from editing. Sikh-History 09:36, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Bhambra, you will be blocked from editing. Sikh-History 09:39, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:13, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sagoo[edit]

The article Sagoo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references given on the page at all. Completely uncited.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 01:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Sagoo[edit]

Hello, Lndpunjab, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Vanamonde93, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Sagoo, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sagoo.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanamonde93}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanamonde (Talk) 20:26, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]