User talk:Loask

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Loask (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked because of supposed "sockpuppetry", although the accounts in question belonged to my friends, and did no not come under WP:MEAT because they were not single use accounts created for any particular purpose. We were blocked before we could defend ourselves against the allegations

Decline reason:

Your account has only ever been used previously for trolling, so I see no reason to unblock you at this time. -- Netsnipe ► 17:48, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Music Construction Set, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DWaterson 20:23, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 18[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Music Construction Set. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Onorem♠Dil 20:06, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Weasel Thomas[edit]

Weasel Thomas, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Weasel Thomas satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weasel Thomas and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Weasel Thomas during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — iridescent (talk to me!) 13:58, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Loask for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. — iridescent (talk to me!) 13:09, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]