User talk:LobitoSnr

February 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Madbrad200 (talk) 09:51, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

X3M Ideas moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to X3M Ideas. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jamiebuba (talk) 07:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

Hello LobitoSnr. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:X3M Ideas, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:LobitoSnr. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=LobitoSnr|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Jamiebuba (talk) 07:47, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not receiving any financial stake for writing on this topic. X3M ideas is a reputable company in Nigeria, i just feel it should be on Wikipedia. It is notable and properly referenced. Oklo Adiga (talk) 08:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, LobitoSnr. Thank you for your work on Maryam Bukar Hassan. User:FuzzyMagma, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|FuzzyMagma}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:34, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank so you much! Oklo Adiga (talk) 19:47, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Desmond Kon.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Desmond Kon.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 20:44, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: X3M Ideas (October 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:X3M Ideas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:50, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LobitoSnr! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 07:50, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MarkIblog. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 00:10, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there @Spicy I don't know why you think I am affiliated with Marklblog but I am not. As for the multiple accounts I will be very honest with you, I do have some other Wikipedia accounts I had no idea it is not allowed forgive me and also can you please returned the pages I created? I was really proud of those pages, they encouraged me to do more edits. I'd really appreciate if I can get my account unblocked and all pages and edits restored. Thanks so so much. Oklo Adiga (talk) 09:32, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I promise to stop using multiple accounts. Oklo Adiga (talk) 09:35, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Spicy I'd really appreciate if you could reply. Oklo Adiga (talk) 06:30, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can follow the instructions in the above notice to create an unblock request, which will be reviewed by another admin. Spicy (talk) 09:18, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oklo Adiga (talk) 12:33, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Oklo Adiga (talk) 06:02, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]