User talk:Loftybunch1

UPSL[edit]

Thank you for talking to me. What I would suggest is using the talk page for the UPSL. Hopefully you and TheScottDL can reach an amicable solution. The set of American soccer is confusing to me, so I do not really know who is correct. Unfortunately for you, if an IP user reverts with an explanation with the revert, I am inclined to restore the previous version. Red Jay (talk) 12:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to undo edits your account will be sent on to appropriate Wikipedia moderators. Not sure why you insist on making this one and only edit - since you seem to be new I will leave it at this... for now. TheScottDL (talk) 00:58, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at United Premier Soccer League shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Meters (talk) 00:59, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's a problem on Wikipedia, I know other pages that are sourced, but I 'know' are not correct. All I can say advise is to find sources. I did change the UPSL to state Level (de facto). It be worth having a comment in the text, with a citation needed until it is found. Red Jay (talk) 13:27, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What is your deal? You contribute nothing other than a number... TheScottDL (talk) 04:15, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to TheScottDL Loftybunch1 (talk) 16:00, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017[edit]

Hello. I noticed that you attempted to file a deletion discussion on the article Alessandro Venezia but did not complete the process. Please note that, when listing an article for deletion, a discussion page needs to be made for other users to discuss whether to keep or delete the article. This is typically done by following the steps listed here. Note that if you are editing as an unregistered user, you cannot create a discussion page. Please consider registering an account or asking another user to help you complete the process at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion. Thank you. ansh 666 21:06, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alessandro Venezia[edit]

You put up the Alessandro Venezia article for deletion claiming there aren't sources to support facts in the article. The only credible source I find is the Sky Sports Italia source, talking about his time in armenia. Do you think this source provides enough info to change your vote to keep? This is a debate I am considering.Demitrius39 (talk) 01:53, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to talk.Loftybunch1 (talk) 02:15, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]