User talk:Logan/Archive 9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5 ← Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 → Archive 15

Check your AWB sttings

This edit] slapped {{Uncategorized stub}} on 47th General Assembly of Newfoundland and Labrador even though it already sported {{Canada-politics-stub}}, which put the article in Category:Canada politics stubs. -Rrius (talk) 04:49, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for letting me know. I believe that AWB only checks for categories that are not included through templates such as stub templates, as those usually are very generic. Logan Talk Contributions 04:50, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
Then maybe it is a feature not worth using. A huge chunk of articles around Wikipedia use one of hundreds of stub templates to put stubs into categories. -Rrius (talk) 04:53, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2011


Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:45, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Logan. You have new messages at WP:REFUND.
Message added 15:26, 1 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Signpost: 3 October 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:26, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 October 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:46, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 07:45, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to join the January 2012 Move to Commons Drive

You got this message since you added yourself to the last time or is a member that stated yourself for moving files or related help. If you do not want notification for a future drive, please add yourself to this list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Images and Media at 00:03, 15 October 2011 (UTC).

Non-free rationale for File:Arista-networks-logo.jpg

Hi Logan, I saw your comment on my talk page regarding File:Arista-networks-logo.jpg – and I also saw you changed your mind. I updated the logo's page and used the same non-free rationale as that used for the logo of Cisco Systems. Thanks for bringing this up to my attention, I think we're better off now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tsunanet (talk • contribs) 22:13, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:External links

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:External links. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 08:19, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

= — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.170.116.180 (talk) 17:10, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 October 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 10:35, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 09:19, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Logan/Archive 9! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

The Signpost: 24 October 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 10:51, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Layout

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Layout. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 11:17, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 17:34, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Talk page guidelines

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Talk page guidelines. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 12:17, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Office Hours

Hey Logan! Thanks so much for your participation in the Office Hours session; the full logs can be found here, just in case you missed something or want to see precisely who said what. Re your idea for having the feed in a drop-down menu on the talkpage; the devs love it :). It's a "Phase 2" item, which translates into normalspeak as "we'll start working on it in January".

To recap; the barebones plan (without community suggested changes) can be found at WP:AFT5 - if you have any ideas, comments or suggestions, check out the talkpage, which I will be following vociferously. If you don't want to jump in all the time, but do want to participate in topics that particularly interest you, we'll be running a bi-weekly newsletter you can sign up for here. Once again, thanks for the great idea, and your participation so far :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:46, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 November2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:38, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

My Business Article, Speedy Deletion

Why is my article at risk of "Speedy Deletion" it only tells people what the business does.

Teresa May

I was searching for Teresa May, not Theresa May. I know a lot of people who have done the same, hence the redirection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.218.219.124 (talk) 01:15, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on File talk:Lenna.png

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on File talk:Lenna.png. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 13:18, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 November 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:46, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

My SPI mess...

The diff between my balls-up and your fix shows me how it should've been done. Much appreciated. Haploidavey (talk) 23:12, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank u

Thx for recently reverting vandalism to my Talk. Ok, Ihardlythinkso (talk) 06:32, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Non-free content

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 14:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

JAN MONTYN

อยากทราบว่า JAN MONTYN เสียชีวิตหรือยัง ถ้ายังแล้วตอนนี้เค้าอยู่เมืองและประเทศอะไร สามารถติดต่อกับเค้าได้ที่ไหน — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.180.184.34 (talk) 04:30, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Office Hours

  • Hey Logan! Thanks for your wonderful contributions to the office hours session on Friday night :). Logs are here - the next session is on 1 December; hope to see you there! In the meantime, I'll forward your ideas and suggestions to the devs and get back to you on them :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 13:31, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 November 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:09, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:President of Croatia

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:President of Croatia. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 15:16, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Non-free content

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 16:17, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Deletion

Tamale isn't a real language though. Are you going to accept articles in Klingon next? Villiage Pump (talk) 17:52, 28 November 2011 (UTC)Pump, pump.

Huggle

Thanks for the catch! Will debug as necessary before restarting. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 02:30, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Steven (WMF)'s talk page. 23:38, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 November 2011

hi

hi geet — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.76.238.26 (talk) 14:33, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

RFC

care to comment? > Best O Fortuna (talk) 07:36, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Citing sources

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Citing sources. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 16:17, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 December 2011

Crime Prevention

Isn't there a way to prevent User 8.225.198.150 from attacking the Immanuel Kant article?Lestrade (talk) 16:12, 9 December 2011 (UTC)Lestrade

Please see WP:UWLS for information about warning and reporting vandals. Logan Talk Contributions 20:02, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 December 2011

WP:UWTEST update

Hi Logan,

We're currently busy designing some new tests, and we need your feedback/input!

  1. ImageTaggingBot - a bot that warns users who upload images but don't provide adequate source or license information (drafts here)
  2. CorenSearchBot - a bot that warns users who copy-paste text from external websites or other Wikipedia articles (drafts here)

We also have a proposal to test new "accepted," "declined," and "on-hold" templates at Articles for Creation (drafts here). The discussion isn't closed yet, so please weigh in if you're interested.

Thanks for your help! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 02:15, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 December 2011

File source

Hi Logan, regarding File:04 CALDER2.jpg and File:06 BIGFOOT.jpg I have update the source information indicating that both files were given by the author. Thanks for pointing out the problem. Regards, Jeremyjoshua (talk) 10:03, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

That is insufficient, I am afraid. Please communicate the copyright owner's permission via the process set out at WP:IOWN. Note that permission must be for all purposes. Permission for use just on Wikipedia, or for non-commercial use only, is not sufficient. Hope this helps. – ukexpat (talk) 14:30, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Ukexpat, I have contacted the author asking him to send an email with permission to use the files as indicated on the page you suggested. In the meantime the images have been tagged OTRS pending. Thanks Jeremyjoshua (talk) 15:31, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 December 2011

Article Feedback Tool - notes and office hours

Hey guys! Another month, another newsletter.

First off - the first bits of AFT5 are now deployed. As of early last week, the various different designs are deployed on 0.1 percent of articles, for a certain "bucket" of randomly-assigned readers. With the data flooding in from these, we were able to generate a big pool of comments for editors to categorise as "useful" or "not useful". This information will be used to work out which form is the "best" form, producing the most useful feedback and the least junk. Hopefully we'll have the data for you by the end of the week; I can't thank the editors who volunteered to hand-code enough; we wouldn't be where we are now without you.

All this useful information means we can move on to finalising the tool, and so we're holding an extra-important office hours session on Friday, 6th January at 19:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office. If you can't make it, drop me a note and I'll be happy to provide logs so you can see what went on - if you can make it, but will turn up late, bear in mind that I'll be hanging around until 23:00 UTC to deal with latecomers :).

Things we'll be discussing include:

  • The design of the feedback page, which will display all the feedback gathered through whichever form comes out on top.
  • An expansion of the pool of articles which have AFT5 displayed, from 0.1 percent to 0.3 (which is what we were going to do initially anyway)
  • An upcoming Request for Comment that will cover (amongst other things) who can access various features in the tool, such as the "hide" button.

If you can't make it to the session, all this stuff will be displayed on the talkpage soon after, so no worries ;). Hope to see you all there! Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 04:50, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 January 2012

Non-free rationale for File:Suddenlink Logo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Suddenlink Logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 01:29, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

plus Added Logan Talk Contributions 02:03, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi,

I would like to know if the Facebook page NII Organization was created by you as a Wikipedia official contributor. We noticed that you have a low resolution NII logo image, would you mind using a better quality file?

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.242.46.2 (talk) 20:47, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

I am not affiliated with that organization, and thus I cannot, unfortunately, conjure a higher-resolution logo for that article. Logan Talk Contributions 21:19, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Urglaawische_Naame

Hey there. Sorry, I was intending to put two pages into the Pennsylvania German Wikipedia, and I did not realize I was in the English Wikipedia. I did notice, though, that the reason for the deletion was listed as "clear copyright infringement," which is not the case. The page was simply in the Wikipedia of the wrong language. Thank you for deleting it from the English Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Verzannt (talk • contribs) 23:55, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Article Feedback Tool - things to do

Hey guys! A couple of highly important things to do over the next few weeks:

  • We've opened a Request for Comment on several of the most important aspects of the tool, including who should be able to hide inappropriate comments. It will remain open until 20 January; I encourage everyone with an interest to take part :).
  • A second round of feedback categorisation will take place in a few weeks, so we can properly evaluate which design works the best and keeps all the junk out :P. All volunteers are welcome and desired; there may be foundation swag in it for you!

Regards, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 18:50, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 January 2012

A beer for you!

Thanks for wishing me Suyogtalk to me! 15:01, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

Thanks for a lovely birthday greeting to celebtate my first edit! :-) CJ Drop me a line! • Contribs 20:41, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Articles for Creation Appeal

Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2714 submissions waiting to be reviewed.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Are you autoconfirmed?
  5. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog.

The Signpost: 16 January 2012

Article Feedback Tool

Hey guys; apologies for the belated nature of this notification; as you can probably imagine, the whole blackout thing kinda messed with our timetables :P. Just a quick reminder that we've got an office hours session tomorrow at 19:00 in #wikimedia-office, where we'll be discussing the results of the hand-coding and previewing some new changes. Hope to see you there :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:14, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Update: new user warning test results available

Hi WP:UWTEST member, we wanted to share a quick update on the status of the project. Here's the skinny:

  1. We're happy to say we have a new round of testing results available! Since there are tests on several Wikipedias, we're collecting all results at the project page on Meta. We've also now got some help from Wikimedia Foundation data analyst Ryan Faulkner, and should have more test results in the coming weeks.
  2. Last but not least, check out the four tests currently running at the documentation page.

Thanks for your interest, and don't hesitate to drop by the talk page if you have a suggestion or question. Maryana (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PHPmotion logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PHPmotion logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:02, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

office hours

Another notification, guys; Article Feedback Tool office hours on Friday at 19:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office :). If you can't attend, drop me a note and I'll send you the logs when we're done. We're also thinking of moving it to thursday at a later time: say, 22:00 UTC. Speak up if that'd appeal more :) Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 16:17, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 January 2012

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Fæ

A request for comments has been opened on administrator User:Fæ. You are being notified due to your prior participation in ANI, RfA, or RfC discussions regarding this user. Thank you, MadmanBot (talk) 19:38, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 January 2012

*poke*

Just a reminder; office hours tonight at 21:00 UTC :). We've got the feedback page deployed on enwiki! We can show it off now :D. Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 15:28, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 February 2012

The Signpost: 13 February 2012

The Signpost: 20 February 2012

The Signpost: 27 February 2012

The Signpost: 05 March 2012

Orphaned non-free image File:Google Music logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Google Music logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:22, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day

Happy First Edit Day, Logan, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 10:12, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 March 2012

The Signpost: 19 March 2012

The Signpost: 26 March 2012

Two Pilots

Hello,

I'm the author of the Two Pilots page and i'm wonder why you put speedy deletion. I'm using this page as a starting point: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toy_Kingdom and i don't see any difference, why some company can have page on the Wikipedia and some other is not. Can you explain this ? I even did not finished the page yet.

Best regards, Stanislav — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spanasik (talk • contribs) 13:05, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 April 2012

File:Joystiq logo.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Joystiq logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:53, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Zazzle logo.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Zazzle logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 15:54, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 April 2012

The Signpost: 16 April 2012

Orphaned non-free image File:KirloskarGroup.svg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KirloskarGroup.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:41, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi

I saw on your userpage that you would like to become an administrator one day. Can I nominate you? Tomtomn00 (talk • contributions) 16:56, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your offer, but I feel that I am not currently active enough to accept this nomination. It wouldn't make sense. Logan Talk Contributions 22:06, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to Berlin hackathon, and possible sponsorship - template makers wanted

I invite you to the yearly Berlin hackathon, 1-3 June in Berlin, Germany. Registration is now open. If you need financial assistance or help with visa or hotel, then please register by May 1st and mention it in the registration form.

This is the premier event for the MediaWiki and Wikimedia technical community. We'll be hacking, designing, teaching, and socialising, primarily talking about ResourceLoader and Gadgets (extending functionality with JavaScript), the switch to Lua for templates, Wikidata, and Wikimedia Labs.

We want to bring 100-150 people together, including lots of people who have not attended such events before. User scripts, gadgets, API use, Toolserver, Wikimedia Labs, mobile, structured data, templates -- if you are into any of these things, we want you to come!

I also thought you might want to know about other upcoming events where you can learn more about MediaWiki customization and development, how to best use the web API for bots, and various upcoming features and changes. We'd love to have power users, bot maintainers and writers, and template makers at these events so we can all learn from each other and chat about what needs doing.

Check out the the developers' days preceding Wikimania in July in Washington, DC and our other events.

Best wishes! - Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation's Volunteer Development Coordinator. Please reply on my talk page at mediawiki.org. Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation Volunteer Development Coordinator 00:59, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 April 2012

The Signpost: 30 April 2012

The Signpost: 07 May 2012

The Signpost: 14 May 2012

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Logan/Archive_9&oldid=1144526044"