User talk:LoliContribute

August 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm KGirlTrucker81. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Shooting of Amadou Diallo— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 18:59, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shooting of Amadou Diallo. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Shooting of Amadou Diallo was changed by LoliContribute (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959809 on 2017-08-05T19:27:48+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:27, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Shooting of Amadou Diallo, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 19:32, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shooting of Amadou Diallo. Instantmatter49 (talk) 19:39, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia for vandalism. Page blanking, addition of random text or spam, repeated tripping of the edit filter, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of our neutrality policy are considered vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Malinaccier (talk) 20:18, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]