User talk:Lolizzie

peer review: The lead section was great! Great opening lead section. Even though it wasn't said clear cut, I pulled it out pretty well what seemed as if it was the lead section. The key points are also very clear, straight to the point. The contribution was not sufficient at all. I could not quite make out whether this was the whole wiki page or just a section of the page? There is definitely room to add more information. Article topic is clear, references are included also. The contribution does consider a variety of perspectives, but I would suggest when talking about the different degrees, the user uses that as an opportunity to break that area down and expand more! Open it up into brief sections. But things were very neutral. The wikipage was too short to decide whether there was nuances and subtle distinctions. The claims supported are appropriate for the references included along with the information, it is reliable. Because they are from an academic journal. Sources are used and presented well. The wikipage came from a neutral standpoint. I didn't see any opinions stated at all. It was balanced well. But needs to be expanded! It is way too short!

The entry is written well, no grammatical errors spotted. It is simple cut and dry! There wasn't any images at all. For the open-ended questions: The wikipage is very clear cut. But way tooo short! Im wondering where exactly is the rest of the page? it is not bias at all. Two improvements would be expand the article! because it has a good start but its like where is the rest of the article! break down some areas such as the degrees to allow room for expansion and more development.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crystal ceecee (talk • contribs) 20:47, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all Public Administration major with a minor in Chinese.

Underwood's Mussurana - How long ago did they go extinct? -How many lived at what time? - What was thier primary source of food? - Did the snakes behave like regular snakes. - What size did they grow to? - On what continent did they live?

Welcome!

Hello, Lolizzie, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help.

I work with the Wiki Education Foundation, and help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment. If there's anything I can do to help with your assignment (or, for that matter, any other aspect of Wikipedia) please feel free to drop me a note. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:21, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WORKS CITED

Bingham, Lisa Blomgren. "The New Urban Governance: Processes for Engaging Citizens and Stakeholders." Review of Policy Research 23.4 (2006): 815-26. Web.

Booher, David E. "Collaborative Governance Practices and Democracy." National Civic Review 93.4 (2004): 32-46. Web.

Buuren, Arwin, Frank Boons, and Geert Teisman. "Collaborative Problem Solving in a Complex Governance System: Amsterdam Airport Schiphol and the Challenge to Break Path Dependency." Systems Research & Behavioral Science 29.2 (2012): 116-30. Web.

Ghose, Rina. "The Complexities of Citizen Participation through Collaborative Governance." Space & Polity 9.1 (2005): 61-75. Web.

Zadek, Simon. "Global Collaborative Governance: There is no Alternative." 8.4 (2008)Print.