User talk:Lonelyonlyvibesexist
Contested deletion
[edit]This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... ("Credible claim of significance" is a two-part test: Credible and significant. A good mental test is to consider each part discretely:
a) is this reasonably plausible?
b) assuming this were true, would this (or something that 'this' might plausibly imply) cause a person to be notable? Or, in line with point 6 above, does it give plausible indications that research might well discover notability?
So, a claim that the person is the King of Mars would satisfy b, since a person who's King of Mars would almost certainly have coverage in sources that would constitute notability, but of course it fails a, since it's not plausible. Conversely, an article describing a subject whose main claim to fame is that they've been the top of their class for the last four years would pass a, since it's quite plausible for that to be true, but not pass b, since that kind of thing is not likely to lead to notability. hldsh is a documented musical artist. google.com search 'hldsh'
Lonelyonlyvibesexist, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Lonelyonlyvibesexist! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:03, 30 July 2017 (UTC) |
Thank You Wikipedia:Teahouse
[edit]Thank You Wikipedia:Teahouse appreciate your hospitable gesture. I will surely take note.
User:Sjö
[edit]what do you feel needs to be updated after explanation of validity of 'hldsh' page?
Speedy deletion nomination of Hldsh
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Hldsh, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 23:00, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
July 2017
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Hldsh, you may be blocked from editing. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 23:30, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:30, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Lonelyonlyvibesexist (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
== Contested deletion == This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (hldsh has had over 2,000,000 impressions across all of his social media platforms combined, reaching over 1,500,000 people. he is a very hard working independent artist, with several blogs posting his musical releases included as follows: http://commotionmag.com/hldsh-folorarecords-what-you-know/, http://outthabando.com/2017/05/26/hldsh-folorarecords-what-you-know/, http://musicindustrytalk.com/2017/05/26/hldsh-folorarecords-what-you-know/, http://theblogpranos.com/hldsh-folorarecords-what-you-know/, http://monkears.com/hldsh-folorarecords-what-you-know/, http://www.musictalentpool.com/featured-artists/hldsh-folorarecords-what-you-know/, http://yourdailydope.com/uncategorized/hldsh-folorarecords-what-you-know/) == Contested deletion == This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... ("Credible claim of significance" is a two-part test: Credible and significant. A good mental test is to consider each part discretely: a) is this reasonably plausible? b) assuming this were true, would this (or something that 'this' might plausibly imply) cause a person to be notable? Or, in line with point 6 above, does it give plausible indications that research might well discover notability? So, a claim that the person is the King of Mars would satisfy b, since a person who's King of Mars would almost certainly have coverage in sources that would constitute notability, but of course it fails a, since it's not plausible. Conversely, an article describing a subject whose main claim to fame is that they've been the top of their class for the last four years would pass a, since it's quite plausible for that to be true, but not pass b, since that kind of thing is not likely to lead to notability. hldsh is a documented musical artist. Google search 'hldsh' == Contested deletion == This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (page was checked for errors & Wikipedia has confirmed there are none. as well criteria for a musical artist page have been met.) There were no improper edits to hldsh page. Citation error report →″no errors found″ citation was removed→ db-band
Decline reason:
You were blocked because you persistently removed a speedy deletion template from a page you created yourself. Removing tags like that is disruptive. To be unblocked, you must demonstrate that you understand why you were blocked and that you agree to refrain from such conduct in the future. —C.Fred (talk) 23:53, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Notification
[edit]As a new user & following all coding correctly. Will said page return or no? Thank You.
Notification
[edit]I will demonstrate that I understand removing tags like that is disruptive & refrain from doing so. As well as requesting an opportunity to continue working on the page. It is hard to respond to so many warring edits at once. While only having a complete 48 hours to work on the page continually.
Lonelyonlyvibesexist (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #18871 was submitted on Jul 31, 2017 00:46:40. This review is now closed.