User talk:Loopthaq

March 2007

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Teenwag. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are however welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. —Ocatecir ^Talk 21:25, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Mormon. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. —Ocatecir ^Talk 21:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise the userpages of other users, as you did to User:Ocatecir, you will be blocked. —Ocatecir ^Talk 21:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Moroni (prophet), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from any site that uses the MediaWiki spam blacklist, which includes all of Wikimedia and Wikipedia. —Ocatecir ^Talk 21:52, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Teenwag

Why do you want to delete the good page of Teenwag on wikipedia? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Loopthaq (talk • contribs) 07:19, 27 March 2007.

Why do I want this article deleted ? Primarily because an article on it does not meet the standards here, specifically it falls under the criteria listed in what wikipedia is not. The primary requirement here is that everything in the article must be attributable to a reliable source so someone else, somewhere, must have written about the subject. Teenwag has not been written up in newspapers, books, journals or any other place that could be seen as reliable. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia writing ONLY about what has been written about elsewhere....anything written here that is not from a reliable source is eventually removed or deleted as original research - Peripitus (Talk) 03:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

so there is a disconnect between online n offline world n no real company has an ofline presence search blogs for teenwag you ll see it being covered very well —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Loopthaq (talk • contribs) 15:11, 28 March 2007.

I think if you read about reliable sources you'll find that blogs are not counted as such. The net is full of thousands of sites, which the site's users think are important, but about which the world at large does not care - Peripitus (Talk) 09:44, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Teenwag, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Ocatecir ^Talk 05:30, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]