User talk:Lopkap-lokmak3-lozyflw

Hello

This is Lopkap-lokmak3-lozyflw's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Multiple accounts[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:57, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts Confirmed to this user:

This is either trolling or WP:CIR.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:57, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lopkap-lokmak3-lozyflw (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Lopkap-lokmak3-lozyflw (talk) 22:20, 19 May 2021 (UTC) I wasn’t sockpuppeting and I didn’t know this policy. Even if I did, I wasn’t using these accounts (illegitimate[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 22:54, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to modify declined unblock requests for your currently active block, as you did here. Do not do so again. You are welcome to make a new unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 12:58, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lopkap-lokmak3-lozyflw (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Lopkap-lokmak3-lozyflw (talk) 13:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC)I read the policy and it didn't say using more than one account is sockpuppeting (I maybe wrong). I was also not using these account to troll or something. I am sorry for breaking the policy.[reply]

Decline reason:

"I read the policy and it didn't say using more than one account is sockpuppeting". Weeeeelllll ... if that doesn't set the world record for wikilawyering, I can't imagine what would. "(I maybe wrong)" you then say, perhaps suspecting this.

Well ... it is, yes, technically true that there are situations outlined at WP:SOCK where the use of an alt account is permissible, but note first what it says in "in a nutshell" at the top of the page: "The general rule is one editor, one account". Seems pretty clear what we mean. And even given the existence of the other exceptions, I don't think anyone with as many documented socks as you have can possibly lay claim to any of them. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.