Jump to content

User talk:Lordofcorona

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rahul Datta (May 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 08:08, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Lordofcorona! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 08:08, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rahul Datta (May 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Aafī (talk) 15:03, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rahul Datta[edit]

Information icon Hello, Lordofcorona. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rahul Datta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rahul Datta[edit]

Hello, Lordofcorona. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rahul Datta".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 08:35, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

Information icon

Hello Lordofcorona. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Lordofcorona. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lordofcorona|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 11:51, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rahul Datta (October 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Nothing in this draft is sourced, except for two entries in the filmography, where one of them is sourced with five copies of the same press release, and the other one with two copies of another press release.

None of the roles listed is a major part, and none of his productions appears to be notable. Every production of a notable play such as Waiting for Godot isn't going to be individually notable.

bonadea contributions talk 12:01, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]