User talk:LouisianaDavis

If you want to tell me something, don't hesitate ! I will answer you asap.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Caux9 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Caux9. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LouisianaDavis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Bbb23 and Oshwah,
I am surprised by this unjustified final ban by the moderators. I have defended myself against Belyny's multiple attacks - and personal attacks, against all rules of propriety - against me. If you had followed its history of modifications you would know that this contributor is single-issue and has the ambition to spread his own (defamatory) vision of things, denying any source going against him.
My 'Caux9' account had not been active for several weeks and was not participating in the ongoing exchanges on the Etienne de Perier discussion page - only my LouisianaDavis account was involved, you will admit.
I have never been blocked on English Wikipedia and am an active, well-argued contributor as my recent edits attest.
In this regard, I ask you to promptly lift this unjust sanction on at least one of my two accounts. Otherwise, I would ask you to also block indefinitely the "user" Belyny - the contributor who denounced and attacked me - who has a proven account on the French Wikipedia (I had opened a request on this subject, strangely ignored by the Wikipedia administrators).
Thank you in advance.
LouisianaDavis (talk) 08:12, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please see WP:GAB. Comment only about your own actions, not those of other editors. I see both accounts edited the same article. Please show where you declared this account as an alternate account of your original, or please explain what exception you are claiming under WP:SOCK#NOTIFY. My very quick investigation showed you appeared to be attempting to mislead us by claiming these two accounts were not related. Yamla (talk) 13:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yamla, I never said that my accounts were not linked. However, if you look at the Étienne de Perier talk page, Caux9 never participated in the exchanges between LouisianaDavis and the other contributors because I haven't used that account for several weeks - and had no intention of using it. I would like to stress that, with the exception of this error which was corrected within a minute (due to a connection from my mobile phone), I have never used both my accounts at the same time. Never. I hope you will understand. Kind regards,LouisianaDavis (talk) 14:32, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

LouisianaDavis persists in his bad faith and he keeps on taking people for fools :

He denied being a sockpuppet [1]
He always refused to answer when the question was asked (many times)
Aggravating circumstances: LouisianaDavis is not a newbie in Sockpuppetry, his master sockpuppet Caux is blocked on French Wikepedia for the same reason. See : [2] [3]
He was also very agressive with others [4]

Such behaviour is definitively unacceptable. Regard, --Belyny (talk) 23:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Savary34 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Savary34. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 20:23, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]