User talk:Love Emily Lalonde

September 2021[edit]

Please refrain from hijacking pages as you did with Curtis Williams. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Politanvm ^talk 22:24, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Startup company. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 20:17, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think if someone putting references on a relevant information, are promoting something? Why would I take a link if i know well about the no-follow policy? You guys are working like a AI which is totally useless, I done my contribution,, if you think that, it is not relevant then remove the link.

I already disappointed after rejecting my articles. External link to a relevant sources are allowed in Wiki. Love Emily Lalonde (talk) 20:50, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Startup company, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. References should include links to reliable sources, and an unrelated company website is not a reliable source. You are welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, but you may find Help:Introduction to be a useful guide to getting started. Politanvm ^talk 21:05, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Curtis Williams Photographer (September 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by DGG were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is entirely advertising for his endeavors. There's no prospect for a better article,for there's no indication ofnotability .

DGG ( talk ) 04:35, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Love Emily Lalonde! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 04:35, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Love Emily Lalonde. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Curtis Williams Photographer, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:49, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Curtis Williams Photographer[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Curtis Williams Photographer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Salimfadhley (talk) 19:35, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Curtis Williams Jr. Fotograf: Light, The Essence of Life (September 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:NBOOKS

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Curtis Williams Jr. Fotograf: Light, The Essence of Life and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Curtis Williams Jr. Fotograf: Light, The Essence of Life, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:51, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have refused to confirm your obvious conflict of interest with photographer Curtis Williams, and now I find you inserting spam links into articles, again, despite being reverted twice at startup company almost a week ago. With zero good-faith edits, I think it's clear that you're not here to contribute to the encyclopedia in a constructive manner. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:57, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are acting like a robot and do not bother yourself to read a single line of content from a source links. I didn't share any spam link and just shared PDF format file, which is based on proper search and facts. there is no any external linking within pdf file. Love Emily Lalonde (talk) 20:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And I think you are getting paid to spam Wikipedia. But here, I'll make you an offer: if you can explain what this PDF has to do with the fairly specific concept of research on Inuit clothing, I will unblock you. Go ahead, I'll wait. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:36, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

sure thing, read the complete research report regarding clothing industry revolution specially and growing demand after 2016. Its a normal topic and I'm not getting paid anything with this contribution. Love Emily Lalonde (talk) 20:54, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So, no connection to the topic whatsoever. Unsurprising, considering the word "Inuit" doesn't appear in the PDF even once, let alone any content about doing research on it. Thank you for confirming my suspicion; I see no reason to unblock you at this time. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:01, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

what is "Inuit" Love Emily Lalonde (talk) 21:03, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Facepalm Incredible. You didn't even read the title of the article you spammed a link into, nor my comment above specifically noting that title. Goodbye. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:09, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

my apologize. I'll take care onwards. Love Emily Lalonde (talk) 21:12, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Curtis Williams Jr. Fotograf: Light, The Essence of Life[edit]

Hello, Love Emily Lalonde. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Curtis Williams Jr. Fotograf: Light, The Essence of Life, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:59, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Curtis Williams Jr. Fotograf: Light, The Essence of Life[edit]

Hello, Love Emily Lalonde. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Curtis Williams Jr. Fotograf: Light".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:11, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]