User talk:Lovely little star

This is Lovely little star's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Wang Hu has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Wang Hu. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:21, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I created this entry after the entry created on the disambiguation page. The title of this draft should be disambiguated. Thank you Lovely little star (talk) 07:07, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your message. I can ask you how to use disambiguation. I just edited Wikipedia and I am not familiar with it soon Lovely little star (talk) 08:47, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wang Hu (businessman) (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wang Hu (businessman) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 12:00, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lovely little star! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 12:00, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wang Hu (businessman) (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wang Hu (businessman) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 06:54, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wang Hu (ShanDong) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Wang Hu (ShanDong), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. This is basically the same article that was denied approval for upgrading from Draft to Article a couple of weeks ago. Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 08:01, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sir, I saw your message to me saying that "it needs more references from reliable and independent sources. Information that can't be cited should be deleted (verifiability is crucial in Wikipedia)". I checked it just now. The content in the entries I wrote has independent and reliable sources. I don't understand what you said. Can you explain it in detail? I'd better give an example. Thank you Lovely little star (talk) 08:06, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We can't have two pages on the same topic, so I merged it into Draft:Wang Hu (businessman). Please check the edit history for prior versions if there is any material there that you would like to include in the new version. ~Anachronist (talk) 12:47, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I looked at your sources. Please read Wikipedia:Golden rule to gain an understanding of what is expected. Sources need to be independent of the topic, reliable, and provide significant coverage. Your first source is an interview and is therefore not independent, because it is basically the subject talking about himself. The second source appears to be a press release and is therefore also not independent of the topic. The remaining sources provide only trivial mentions of the subject, not in-depth coverage. One source doesn't even mention him at all. ~Anachronist (talk) 12:56, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What I still don't understand is what kind of report is independent of the theme of the article? Can you help me find a report on the characters' compliance with the golden rule of Wikipedia, so that I can understand it better, and it is also convenient for me to find a report that also meets the requirements, thank you Lovely little star (talk) 02:22, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I answered this in the comment at the top of the draft.

Generally, newspapers or news sites that have a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy, that are independent of the article topic (that is, no interviews, no blogs, no personal facebook pages, no company press releases) are acceptable sources. The sources must provide significant coverage of the article subject, not simply mention the subject. If no such sources can be found, then the subject does not merit an article here. The fact that a subject merely exists is not a justification for an article on Wikipedia. A subject must be written about in depth. Only one source in the draft has significant coverage, but it looks like it might be a press release written by the subject, his company, or an associate, so may not be independent. Even if it's independent, we need multiple examples of significant coverage, not just one.

You might consider recasting the article to be about a different topic that the sources actually do cover. ~Anachronist (talk) 08:03, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wang Hu (businessman) (September 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anachronist was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See Wikipedia:Golden rule for an overview of what is expected. One source is an interview and therefore not independent. One source provides some coverage but appears to be a press release and is therefore also not independent. The rest of the sources do not provide significant coverage and provide only trivial mentions of the subject. Perhaps the draft could be recast about a China delegation to Egypt, instead of about one person because that's what the sources seem to cover.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wang Hu (businessman) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Anachronist (talk) 12:59, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Liang Congyou (September 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Liang Congyou and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 11:06, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wang Hu (businessman) (November 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Compusolus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wang Hu (businessman) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Compusolus (talk) 01:45, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bei Tong

Hello Lovely little star,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bei Tong for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 17:23, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I don't understand your concern? Can you give me a detailed description of the relevant risk Lovely little star (talk) 02:04, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Liang Congyou

Hello, Lovely little star. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Liang Congyou, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Liang Congyou

Hello, Lovely little star. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Liang Congyou".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:42, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wang Hu (businessman)

Hello, Lovely little star. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wang Hu (businessman), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]