User talk:Lovinblue4eva

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --PMDrive1061 16:31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Dear cupid[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dear cupid, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g11.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. —Ignatzmice ^talk _contribs 16:24, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Cupid[edit]

The version which I deleted consisted only of the words "Dear Cupid". Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion (deletion on sight, basically), stated here include "Any article ... consisting only of links, category tags and "see also" sections, rephrasing of the title". The article was flagged for deletion under this criterion by Arendedwinter and I deleted it. I'm afraid I'm not sure what you mean by "why didn't you just delete the page yourself following the process of how you do it?".

I see you've re-created the page - as it stands it risks immediate deletion again, either as an article which makes "No assertion of importance/significance. An article about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content that does not state why its subject is important or significant.)" or "Blatant advertising. Pages which exclusively promote some entity and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic.". Regards Tonywalton | Talk 16:31, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. If you can come up with reasons why it's "notable" according to WP:WEB please feel free to create it again, making sure you put in why it's notable. Don't be discouraged, we do welcome new editors! Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Tonywalton | Talk 16:46, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007[edit]

Please do not add unreferenced or controversial information about living persons to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Jodie Morton. Thank you.--Alasdair 11:54, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Torn[edit]

Hello. To move a page, you just click on "move" at the top of the article, between history and watch, and then just type in the name you want and a reason for the move. More on moving pages here: WP:MOVE. For Wikipedia naming conventions, check out: WP:NAME. Hope this helps. Regards. dissolve ^talk 13:53, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008[edit]

Please do not use styles that are unusual or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in John Paul McQueen. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Thank you. Hi. Just a note about writing in fiction - Wikipedia is not meant to be a record of everything that happens in a character's lifetime. Please summarise as much as possible, and try and keep notable sections together. Please read the Wikipedia guides for details about this. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 19:50, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Dean, Steph Cunningham and Loretta Jones.[edit]

I know you're trying to help with the articles but you're messing them up a lot. Take a look at Wikipedia's guidelines on writing and explaining fiction. Do so here -> Click the link and to learn. I'm sure you mean well but using articles asif they were a chat site shoutbox or forum isn't a good contrib... Raintheone (talk) 16:24, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

I have decided not to give youy a warning but please take the advice. I've reverted alot of you edits because you are editing in past tense. Storylines need to be written as they are happening now, so don't say "Sinead kissed Taylor" it's "Sinead kisses Taylor" and any point you put 'were or was' in the articles, it needs to be present tense. Add actor names to please so for Arlo Davenport it needed to read Arlo Davenport (Travis Yates) ... (but only if it's the first time they're mentioned in the article, like arlo was.), it's a pain. please don't add episode dates into Storylines either like you did with Sally and Tyrone.RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 22:47, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Lovinblue4eva. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Lovinblue4eva. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]