User talk:Lramirez26

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Enrique Maximiliano Meza[edit]

Please, kindly and wisely move your created Enrique Meza Jr. back to its original article name: Enrique Maximiliano Meza. This man needs his own identity, personally; distinguishing him from his father: Enrique Meza; that's why he basically identifies himself as Enrique Max Meza as short form of Enrique Maximiliano Meza. In critical analysis, title of article on him should remain: Enrique Maximiliano Meza, clearly. Wisely, there's no need for this your redirect from Enrique Maximiliano Meza to Enrique Meza Jr. This confusion is not needed on Wikipedia, please. Article content of: Enrique Maximiliano Meza, appropriately says he is son of Enrique Meza, with citation. As well, article content on his father: Enrique Meza, mentions him as son of Enrique Meza; and that's valuable and sufficient, too. Notably, thanks a million for Enrique Meza Jr. being able to be reached from Enrique Maximiliano Meza, in redirect after your move to Enrique Meza Jr. But, please, wisely move your created Enrique Meza Jr. back to it's original: Enrique Maximiliano Meza. And hugely, Meza family and humankind will be so grateful. Have an abundantly blessed 2018 ahead, in GOD's loving care, always.

Lramirez26, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Lramirez26! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:15, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Indios UACJ logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Indios UACJ logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:18, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:09, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

Please add your sources to Mineros de Zacatecas (basketball). It only has 'external links' at the moment, which means 'suggestions for further reading'. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:39, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Correcaminos UAT Victoria moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Correcaminos UAT Victoria, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's notability requirements and thus is ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:54, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Justlettersandnumbers for the correction, I already improve the references and submit the draft for a new revision. Greetings. --Lramirez26 (talk) 03:13, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Aguacateros de Michoacán[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Lramirez26, thanks for creating Aguacateros de Michoacán!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 07:09, 8 July 2018 (UTC) Hi, Lramirez, just double checking if you understood what I meant or if you need any help? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 10:51, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Libertadores de Querétaro[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Lramirez26, thanks for creating Libertadores de Querétaro!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 07:11, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:12, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

Hello, I've sent you three messages about sourcing. Do you understand the difference between references and external links? What were your sources? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 05:54, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Boleyn, yes, sorry I already read them, I created them using the template of the article Panteras de Aguascalientes, my bad, other user put them in draftspace I will improve and fix them. --Lramirez26 (talk) 15:15, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Marcelo Michel Leaño moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Marcelo Michel Leaño, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your page to draft space (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:22, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Mineros de Zacatecas (basketball), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:28, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aguacateros de Michoacán moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Aguacateros de Michoacán, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your page to draft space (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:34, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]