User talk:Ls1g

October 2024

Hello Ls1g! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Signed, Guessitsavis (she/they) ^Talk 11:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for watching for copyright issues. However, the passage you removed is not copied from https://scads.ai/about-us/ai-professorships/kaai/ but from my private homepage, which I license under CC 0 (the text on the professional website I actually created too, by copy from private website). I restore the passage now, if you still see issues please let me know. Ls1g (talk) 13:13, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You mean from this page, which looks to be a copy of this page, which is copyrighted? This is confusing. However, that's not even really the main point. You basically copied your resume into a Wikipedia article and threw it into main space, without a single secondary source verifying the data in the biography or establishing its notability per WP:PROF. That the editor thought you copied it from the Scads page is no surprise--you hadn't included a citation. I am going to move that article to draft space, since notability is not established and there is no secondary sourcing. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 13:19, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing to that issue. I've added more content, with references, that should hopefully clarify my significance in the academic field of LLMs, KGs, knowledge-aware AI. I can add more content on citation indizes, best paper awards, etc., but it's a bragging I am normally not fond of. I regularly teach in knowledge management and AI and I am a fan of the spirit of the Wikimedia community, it is up to you which story I can tell next. Ls1g (talk) 14:02, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 14:25, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To add on to Drmies's message you CANNOT publish an autobiographical article (or any article where there is a conflict of interest) directly into the mainspace. It must be submitted as a draft to be reviewed. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:28, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I didn't know. Ls1g (talk) 14:37, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Razniewski moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Simon Razniewski (autobiography review). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GPL93 (talk) 14:25, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you check what User:Drmies wrote a few lines above about the need to spell out notability? Yes of course I have a conflict of interest, if that's the showstopper then I'm fine, but your contradictory comments on the content make me very confused now. Ls1g (talk) 14:35, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anything contradictory here between what I said and what GPL93 said. I moved it to draft space because of a total lack of secondary sourcing. You worked on it some, but it is still a resume, and if an article in an encyclopedia is going to claim "He is notable for his leading research on knowledge base construction", then we should have a secondary source that verifies that, especially the "leading" part. No one can claim that for themself, based on their own publication. And one could say "well the fact that it's published means that etc.", but that doesn't work because it's in Arxiv--it's not peer-reviewed, it's not published. BLPs require secondary sources, and the lack thereof is one factor in its promotional quality. A resume is promotional, and a resume is not the same as a biographical article. Drmies (talk) 17:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback. I have reworked the article, adding a secondary source on research, two awards (w/ references), and a biographic detail (w/ reference), while keeping out the resume segments that were perceived as promotional. I also replaced the Arxiv publication links with (open-access) journal references. I'd be thankful if you could spare your time once more to give feedback whether the style and sourcing is now OK. Ls1g (talk) 04:37, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simon Razniewski (autobiography review) (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Simon Razniewski (autobiography review) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 10:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ls1g! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 10:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]