User talk:Luath

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Luath, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -Willmcw 04:46, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Foner article[edit]

Luath - welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your work on the Eric Foner article. You've added many good contributions here, however some of the changes you are making are unconventional. I restored a couple of the things you deleted as they are indeed sourced in existing links at the bottom of the article. Also, please understand that broad proclamations such as "no evidence for such a misattribution can be located" as a basis to delete are not always appropriate, as often times evidence does indeed exist for things you've deleted (e.g. Foner's marxist views, his support for Robeson etc.). Simply being unable to find something on google or the internet is insufficient as a basis for deletion. You should take a moment to also review wikipedia policies such as WP:V and WP:CITE, which indicate that instead of deleting something you believe is unsupported outright, you should first post a message about it on the talk page. This gives other readers a chance to either (a) direct you to the source in case you missed it, such as the links at the end of the article, or (b) seek out and find a source if one is believed to be lacking. This is important because it helps avoid revert wars and also generally improves the sourcing of the article when needed. Please be mindful of these concerns in your future edits, & once again welcome and thank you for your contributions. Rangerdude 06:19, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lynn Garafola. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Nathan2055 ^talk^-^review 00:20, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Luath (talk) 19:56, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Erich, Thank you very much for reviewing my submission on noted dance critic and Barnard professor of dance Lynn Garafola. I appreciate it very much. I do believe that Garafola meets Wikipedia's guidelines for academics which are, of course, detailed here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)#Criteria:

The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources. (Yes. See links to NY Times articles and other reliable third party sources, not to mention the fact that she is a tenured full professor at one of the country's top colleges, and one of the few professors of dance history in the world.)

Academics/professors meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable. Academics/professors meeting none of these conditions may still be notable if they meet the conditions of WP:Notability or other notability criteria, and the merits of an article on the academic/professor will depend largely on the extent to which it is verifiable.

The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level. (Yes. See article entry.)

The person is or has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g. a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a Fellow of a major scholarly society for which that is a highly selective honor (e.g. the IEEE). (Yes. She is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, perhaps the country's most prestigious academic organization.)

The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions. (Yes)

The person holds or has held a named chair appointment or "Distinguished Professor" appointment at a major institution of higher education and research.

The person has held a major highest-level elected or appointed academic post at a major academic institution or major academic society.

The person has made substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity. (Yes. See article entry, in particular the major public exhibitions she has organized).

The person is or has been the head or chief editor of a major well-established academic journal in their subject area.

The person is in a field of literature (e.g writer or poet) or the fine arts (e.g. musician, composer, artist), and meets the standards for notability in that art, such as WP:CREATIVE or WP:MUSIC.

I have resubmitted the article. Many thanks for your continued consideration.

Best,

Luath

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Lynn Garafola, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:25, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Judith Stein (March 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Judith Stein.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 16:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Judith Stein (historian), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

_nonsense ferret 09:17, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Anna Haupt[edit]

Hello, Luath. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anna Haupt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anna Haupt[edit]

Hello, Luath. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anna Haupt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:56, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]