User talk:LucVerhelst

Archives

1 2

Luc Verhelst is taking a long wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia some later time.

Style of cooperation

Hi, I happened to see this edit of yours : [1] and remember our much earlier talk about this title. Just a note to mention my appreciation for the way you seem to cooperate on Wikipedia. — SomeHuman 7 Oct2006 21:04 (UTC)

Thanks

For the kind words. Gabrielthursday 00:47, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Sig

I am having a hard time customizing my sig. Can you help me? I won't just jack your style (I'm not like that), i just want to know what you did. Thanks. By the way, you are doing a good job at the Vlaams Belang article. --Connor K. 01:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you soooo much for the help. Tell me what you think. Is it too much like yours? if so, i can change it. I sorta used your style a bit, but changed it a bit. ¢²  Connor K.  20:08, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Better? heh, I understand what you mean. Alot of peopel don't like pink. I guess what I don't like about pink is it's only a lighter purple. I love the color purple, but unless it's dark, then people call it pink. And a dark purple is too hard to read.

Talk to you later!-- ¢² Connor K.   21:43, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Hmm, I would fix the IE thing, but IE sucks, and my sig is already really long. I don't wanna make it even longer (which is frowned upon). To bad the majority uses IE. And about the spacing thing, i just made the "purple" background shorter and the "pink" background longer by moving the space from the end of the "cent squared" sign to the front of the "Connor K." part. I'll look into changing it.-- ¢²   Connor K.   22:02, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

2006 in Africa

Hi, I was wondering if you could help out with translation when you're back. You did a great job with the last one =) - SpLoT 10:56, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

More disruptions from Intangible

Be extra vigilant on the Vlaams Belang article, where Intangible is attempting to stifle the findings of three of the world's most well-known and reputable news agencies with his spurious reasoning. If he keeps this up, we should report him (again) for violating his probation. -- WGee 00:11, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Ignorant me, I just now noticed your wikibreak banner. Well, if for some reason you choose to return early, you'll have some support in the article: you won't have to deal with Intangible one-on-one, if that's what has frustrated you. -- WGee 03:57, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi Luc! Note than an arbitration enforcement request has been done by Cberlet against Intangible, here. You might be interested in it, as if we eventually manage to solve this problem, we could deal with more interesting aspects of Wikipedia more easily. Right now Intangible is successfully battling a one-man fight against all of us, only because of his stubborn daily edits... Thanks! Tazmaniacs 13:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

'Flemish' article, or 'Flemish' as disambiguation page + 'Flemish (terminology)'

Hi Luc. This last week, I had a long discussion and edit-war with someone who first simply replaced the article Flemish that you, after previous attempts to improve the pre-existing disambiguation page, had initially created [see [2]], with a mere disambiguity page again. Meanwhile for months several contributors had been working at it. I reverted while putting the disambiguation page under 'Flemish (disambiguation)' [at least till consensus would be found, it might eventually be superfluous]. The article was then moved without any consensus and I reverted (a few times). For the moment, there is a proper proposal to move 'Flemish' towards 'Flemish (terminology)' with clear intend to use 'Flemish' as a mere disambiguation page. You had obviously found, like a few others, that this gave little satisfaction: you had taken the most clear initiative in reworking towards an article. Prepare to do a lot of reading, most of the talk page is about this subject at hand... [Note that the older history of 'Flemish' is found as the history of for the moment a redirect page 'Flemish (terminology)': see here]. — SomeHuman 20 Dec2006 20:22 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Belf

Template:Belf has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:39, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Beln

Template:Beln has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:42, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Draining law

Hi Luc, can you please look into the article named "Draining law"? As a German reader I was stunned to find such special article without indication of its specific realm/ reach. Thus I have proposed to rename it "Draining law (Belgium)" which I feel would give a clear hint to other readers. Thank you for your time and trouble! Khnassmacher (talk) 06:49, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

In the meantime I have been advised that a change of name (as suggested above) is no viable way. However, as you have been the most active Wikipedian on this article I have a new suggestion: As a reader from Germany I feel that this article should become part of a more general article an "Party funding in Belgium" which would have to comprise sections on 1. Sources of party funds, 2. Expenses by political parties, 3. Regulation of party funding. The whole article on "Draining law" could go into this final section. We now have quite a "family" of articles on Political party funding and Belgium would contribute towards that "family". How do you feel about it? Khnassmacher (talk) 06:44, 22 June 2013 (UTC) Sorry, that I had put this note on your user page first. Khnassmacher (talk) 16:00, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Melle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aalst. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, LucVerhelst. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)