User talk:Lucy Purnell

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Lucy Purnell

Thank you for creating Susan Golombok.

User:Lopifalko, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for contributing this article. Have a look in its edit history to see what I've done for some tips including how to create links to other Wikipedia articles. Crucially though, the article needs independent reliable sources with significant coverage of the subject; it doesn't appear to have any independent sources, hence why I only consider it "start" class not "C" Class.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lopifalko}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lopifalko (talk) 04:04, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Centre for Family Research (December 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Seraphimblade was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

To demonstrate notability, sources must be reliable, independent, and substantially or entirely about this organization, not just about topics related to it or published by someone affiliated with it. If such source material is unavailable, an article about this organization is not appropriate at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Centre for Family Research and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Centre for Family Research, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 22:19, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lucy Purnell! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 22:19, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Susan Golombok

Hello, Lucy Purnell. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Susan Golombok".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. kingboyk (talk) 16:06, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Centre for Family Research concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Centre for Family Research, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Centre for Family Research

Hello, Lucy Purnell. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Centre for Family Research".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:07, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]