User talk:Lukavisnijc11

December 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Plano West Senior High School, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Meters (talk) 03:07, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Plano West Senior High School. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. There is no way an unsubstantiated claim such as that is going in the article. Even with a reliable source I doubt it is acceptable, but without one, not a chance. Meters (talk) 03:09, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Plano West Senior High School, you may be blocked from editing. Since your supposed source didn't actually support any of your claims I'm treating this as vandalism. I suggest that you read WP:RS and WP:EW. Meters (talk) 03:41, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We do actually read sources when we check edits. A generic 2009 source as a reference for negative claims about a 2017 incident is garbage. Take it to the talk page and provide a real source to be checked, or leave it alone. Meters (talk) 03:44, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. Making unsubstantiated negative claims is a bad idea. Doing it a second time is worse. Pretending to source it the third time with a generic ref that doesn't address the issues and predates the incident by 8 years is a really bad idea. Coming to my page and making more claims, well, just stop now. It's a BLP violation to make such claims about the administration. And as for saying you are "seeking justice on Wikipedia by making sure everyone will see the truth", see WP:Righting great wrongs Meters (talk) 04:41, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I'd add that before news items like this can be included in a Wikipedia school article, you must show that the issue has garnered geographically widespread (ie, from areas removed from North Texas) coverage that had endured over time. Wikipedia is not a newspaper, and articles in it are not written to inform the local population associated with the subject of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 06:06, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]