User talk:Lukedenman21

May 2015

Hello, I'm Kharkiv07. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Rick Riordan— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kharkiv07^Talk 23:22, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rick Riordan with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Kharkiv07^Talk 23:23, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jigglypuff, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Jigglypuff was changed by Lukedenman21 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951274 on 2015-05-04T23:28:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:28, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Meta Knight.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Meta Knight was changed by Lukedenman21 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894678 on 2015-05-04T23:31:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:31, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Tiptoety ^talk 23:55, 4 May 2015 (UTC)