User talk:Lumidulce

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Regarding your edits to Rebels (album):[edit]

Your recent edit to Rebels (album) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 23:53, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Ronbo76 22:02, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Image-RBD001.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Image-RBD001.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:12, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent contribution(s) to the Wikipedia article Dignity (album) are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at How to cite sources. Thanks! Extraordinary Machine 00:33, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Pts.Of.Athrty / H! Vltg3 (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 23:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I erased the page because that album never existed and is some shit people write without knowing. Like the page was fake I erased. That was the best I could of done.