User talk:Lusich

Regarding edits made during January 28 2007 (UTC) to Serbophobia[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Asterion^talk 09:43, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If however you can find materials that meet guidlines such as WP:Verifiability please either add it to the article with a citation for the source or post the citation to the discussion page. Anyway, welcome to Wikipedia, it can be quite a learning experience and a lot of fun. SmithBlue 12:36, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You claim encyclopedia neutrality and non-bias...yet you fail to see such an obvious thing as pro-ultranationalist and propaganda bias of the aforementioned article. The term serbophobia has been used as a tool to shape public opinion in Serbia for brutal ethnic cleansing and genocide against non-serbs in Croatia, Bosnia and Kosovo...yet the article mentions nothing of those events or the reasons for so called "Serbophobia" The article is a Serbian equivalent of neo-nazi propaganda. I wander how long such an article would exist, if for example it claimed that the victims of the WWII were Germans and that the bad guys were the Jews???

I'm not claiming neutrality or even non-bias for the article - only that so far the referenced material presented for this article has produced the artcle as it is now. If you can find and present relevant verifiable material and that material is not allowed in the article I will support you in getting non-bias happening whether by RfC, AfD or Jim. I'm on the other side of the world - all I know about this subject is the material put forward at the article and old news reports. And there are some assumptions I have about about human behavior. So from here things that are obvious to you come across to me as uncited claims. If cited material about the use of "Serbophobia" as a public opinion shaping tool exists then it definately belongs in this article. Your hypothesized article about presenting Germans as victims and Jews as bad guys should, I think, be created if material supporting this exists - and material analysing and criticisng the flaws in such a position should be included too. SmithBlue 02:51, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New to this? or need help[edit]

Having a quick read of these Wikipedia articles that will make things clearer.

If you've got a bit more time then Welcome is the way to go. SmithBlue 12:36, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Professional welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Lusich, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

You should put something on your user page, too. --PaxEquilibrium 20:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:V 27-01-2003 CLINTON DAVOS-1 BOBO.JPG[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:V 27-01-2003 CLINTON DAVOS-1 BOBO.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 00:24, 26 February 2008 (UTC) --Polly (Parrot) 00:24, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:V TIWANACU.3.JPG[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:V TIWANACU.3.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 00:25, 26 February 2008 (UTC) --Polly (Parrot) 00:25, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Stirje-1.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Stirje-1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eleassar ^{my talk} 18:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images listed for deletion[edit]

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them.

Thank you. Eleassar ^{my talk} 18:43, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]