User talk:M.k.pappu
September 2015[edit]
Hello, I'm Bentogoa. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Northern Dimension Partnership in Public Health and Social Well-being with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Bentogoa (talk) 08:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
January 2017[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 18:15, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Sanjay Sriivastava for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sanjay Sriivastava is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Sriivastava until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:46, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Shriman Mishra[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Shriman Mishra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 08:28, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
- Regarding Speedy Deletion
- Hello, M.k.pappu. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but this has been deleted as meeting one or more of the Categories for Speedy Deletion. See the message above this one for more information about why this was deleted.
- Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject.
- Any deficiencies should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions.
- If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard to guide you through the creation process.
- You can make test edits in your sandbox.
- You may find this tool useful for finding sources: Google custom search
- Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources . Template:cite has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{references}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there.
The article Kaashi Amarnath has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication of notability per WP:NFILM or the WP:GNG. Single source cited is a trivial, passing mention. Author appears to have a WP:COI.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Joe (talk) 11:28, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest[edit]
Hello, M.k.pappu. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Kaashi Amarnath, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
- avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
- instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
- when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Joe (talk) 11:30, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Kaashi Amarnath for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kaashi Amarnath is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaashi Amarnath until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Joe (talk) 14:10, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The article Action Raja has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Created by an author with strong WP:COI, already been deleted thrice and still fails WP:NFILM no significant coverage in reliable sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk|c|em) 05:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Action Raja[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Action Raja, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:39, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Dear Sir,
i used reliable sources. Please re-chake my page
The article Action Raja (2017 Film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Already been deleted 5 times as Action Raja and still no significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:NFILM and the creator appear to have a close connection with the subject too.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk|c|em) 12:18, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Dear Sir,
i used reliable sources. Please re-chake my page
Other accounts[edit]
Hello M.k.pappu, I would like to know if you have used any other account(s) other than this one? If so, can you please say exactly what accounts you have used. Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 12:24, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
- Can you please answer my question above. Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 13:12, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Warning[edit]
It is obvious from your edits and your userpage that you have a conflict of interest on articles related to Bhojpuri films. As explained at WP:COI, you should not be editing pages on which you have a conflict of interest. Please find a different topic to make contributions on. If you persist in editing articles on which you have a COI, you are likely to end up with a block or topic ban. The notification below is simply to let you know that on topics related to WP:ARBIPA, such as the ones you have edited, any administrator who isn't involved may impose such a block or ban without further warning. Regards, Vanamonde (talk) 08:11, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Vanamonde93: M.k.pappu recreated the same article again using his another account Pappuad (talk · contribs) so can you please take care of this. Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 03:15, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.March 2018[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanamonde (talk) 04:36, 20 March 2018 (UTC)Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction[edit]
The following sanction now applies to you:
You are indefinitely banned from editing anything related to Bhojpuri films, broadly construed.
You have been sanctioned for persistently editing in violation of our policy on conflicts of interest.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Vanamonde (talk) 04:49, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
The article Qais Tanvee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication of notability per WP:GNG (Google results are not significant) or WP:NACTOR (has only been in one film).
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster talk 16:02, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
May 2018[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ... discospinster talk 16:08, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
M.k.pappu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #23004 was submitted on Oct 21, 2018 09:24:29. This review is now closed.