User talk:M.stoverceo

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page African-American music, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! DanCherek (talk) 04:45, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep the copyright redaction template at the top of the article until an administrator has reviewed it and redacted the revisions in the page history. It will be removed at that time. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 05:18, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information, I edited or removed the other two that had the same conditions. I think I have an understanding how to create now. M.stoverceo (talk) 05:23, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Your edit to Burna Boy has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. --Hammersoft (talk) 04:53, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you persist in adding copyright content as you did at African-American music, you will be blocked from editing. We take copyright quite seriously here. You can't simply take something you find on the Internet and copy/paste it here. If you have questions, ask. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 17:06, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the ones in question and corrected my faults. I didn't mean to cause any wrong doings with my edits. In the future, my posts will be in my own words. Apologies for the confusion on my part. M.stoverceo (talk) 17:23, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Big Stove moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Big Stove, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 08:51, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When you say suitable, are you saying more from bigger, more influential brands? Reason I ask is that I researched many other pages and some have less than what I have and have been published for years. For an artist page, Do you have any input on the types of citations that would make this page hold notability? The general notability guideline is very broad and suggests citations that more than likely won't showcase an artist unless they are as big as Drake or Miley Cyrus lol. But I've seen artist pages that showcase ones who have very little notability and don't have much issue. Then again I think it's because I'm new, and that would be understandable to focus on the article citations more to build my credibility up. Thank you for making it a draft and not deleting it, this took me many hours to get this far. M.stoverceo (talk) 16:54, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Big Stove (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Big Stove and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Big Stove, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 23:13, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, M.stoverceo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 23:13, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Big Stove

Hello, M.stoverceo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Big Stove, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Big Stove

Hello, M.stoverceo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Big Stove".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]