User talk:M105-S322

Welcome!

Hello, M105-S322, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like One-democratic-state solution, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Blowdart | ^talk 20:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of One-democratic-state solution

A tag has been placed on One-democratic-state solution requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Blowdart | ^talk 20:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meaning of Your Name

Do you own a toshiba satellite computer laptop computer?

http://www.clearanceclub.com/depot/quelle_showroom.cgi?sku=5114

Holocaust denial

Please do not change the initial phrasing to "holocaust revision". The title of the page itself is "holocaust denial"; as such, the bolded text should not say anything different. For the discussions pertaining to the name change to "holocaust revision" and the consensus please see [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] Ironholds (talk) 20:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Criticism of Holocaust denial. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Ironholds (talk) 20:46, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Holocaust denial. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:50, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 21:01, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Wendy Campbell, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Avi (talk) 04:00, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, edit summaries like this one, and others today, casting aspersions on other contributors, are completely unacceptable. If you cannot contribute neutrally and collegially, you may not be allowed to contribute at all. ++Lar: t/c 19:39, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

Changing references in a tag breaks the rest of the time the tag is used. I found the "Disclosure!" page on MarWen Media that supports the data, and now that is being used, as marwenmedia.com may be used to support data about Wendy Campbell. -- Avi (talk) 04:48, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]