User talk:MARIODOESBREAKFAST

Recent edit to Bitcoin network

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Epicgenius (talk) 19:22, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: CryptoNote (June 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:CryptoNote.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:20, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello! MARIODOESBREAKFAST, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:20, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: CryptoNote (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t) Josve05a (c) 10:00, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Explanation

Y'know, I really thought that template:Whydidyoudothat would address all the questions I get about this.

First, read that template. Second, as for the merits of your draft: I have assessed it as a valid draft, not as a valid article. (Yes, there can be such a thing as a non-valid draft which requires deletion.) I've just reread your draft, and... well, honestly, I'm not really someone who can judge whether a draft on a cryptocurrency properly shows notability. I don't think your draft is ready to be an article: there are too many cryptocurrencies, we don't have articles about all of them. They don't achieve notability just by virtue of existing (unlike, for instance, cities or species); can you show us any media coverage of this cryptocurrency? Not media coverage which incidentally mentions it, but which is about it? DS (talk) 14:09, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: CryptoNote has been accepted

CryptoNote, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The herald 15:01, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Ways to improve CoinJoin

Hi, I'm Ironholds. MARIODOESBREAKFAST, thanks for creating CoinJoin!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The notability of this isn't clear; please add reliable sources, rather than reddit threads and similar.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Ironholds (talk) 23:22, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Cryptocurrency task force Invite

-- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 14:25, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of CoinJoin

The article CoinJoin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability - one RS (Wired), two other third-party sources that aren't accepted as evidence of notability (Coindesk), the rest is entirely primary. Has apparently been this way for years now - hasn't improved in that time. WP:BEFORE shows negligible coverage outside bitcoin blogs, many of which are pay-for-play outlets.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 22:11, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of CoinJoin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CoinJoin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CoinJoin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. David Gerard (talk) 12:00, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of CryptoNote for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CryptoNote is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CryptoNote until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. David Gerard (talk) 09:50, 4 January 2019 (UTC)