User talk:MDnews2u

Your article[edit]

didn't get 5 days, it was speedy deleted. I'm goingt o suggest you read up on how to edit on Wikipedia, and especially about the WP:RULES. Let me know if you have questions, or better yet place {{helpme}} here on your talk page, along with your questions. KillerChihuahua^?!? 19:19, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Immediate Care Wichita[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Immediate Care Wichita, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:17, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Immediate Care Wichita[edit]

Thank you for your message. This article was tagged by another editor for speedy deletion. When I reviewed it, I saw that the content did not resemble an encyclopedic article in any way, was minded to agree and so deleted it. Kind regard. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:38, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged the article for deletion because it appeared to be an unremarkable business. Whether it is unique in South Central Kansas is not a criterion for notability, and simply adding a hangon tag or removing the speedy tag is not "successfully contesting" the proposed deletion - you may not remove speedy deletion tags from an article you created. You also appear to misunderstand deletion policy in general. Non-notable businesses may be speedily deleted. I suggest you acquaint yourself with wikipedia's standards for corporate notability and examine whether this particular business meets those standards: attention solely by local media is not an indication of notability. Other sources of more than a purely local nature will be necessary to establish notability: if you can provide such sources, I will be happy to advise you. Most local newspapers write articles on local businesses as a matter of general interest, but it does not establish notability on Wikipedia. Acroterion _(talk) 21:04, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Your article was deleted in accordance with the speedy deletion criteria, meaning no time period was required. This has been explained to you several times in a reasonable manner, yet you are spamming multiple talk pages about this matter. If you do not stop, you may find yourself blocked for disruption Fritzpoll (talk) 20:41, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CANVASS[edit]

Please refrain from spamming multiple talk pages about the same issue in an attempt to get a different answer. See Wikipedia:FORUMSHOP. KillerChihuahua^?!? 20:43, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Final Warning[edit]

(crossposted) Given that he says specifically that he was not using it in a homophobic sense, it is unfair to characterise it as such. If you continue to ignore users who have told you why the article was deleted under an appropriate process (five day deletion is not a "right" - compare WP:PROD and WP:CSD), you will be blocked for disruption Fritzpoll (talk) 21:23, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied[edit]

User:MDnews2u/Immediate Care Wichita. I suggest you make a copy yourself, as this userfied page may be deleted at any time. KillerChihuahua^?!? 21:35, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tan | 39 22:33, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Trolling"[edit]

In on-line forum terminology, "trolling" means posting messages meant to provoke or perplex. It has nothing to do with the gay slang sense of "troll" as an old, unpleasant man who hits on younger men.

You asked me about retrieving your previous text. You can get it from the deleting admins, User talk:Redvers or User talk:Malcolmxl5.—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:53, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Frontdesk.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Frontdesk.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:08, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tony Fox (arf!) 07:15, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]