User talk:MGerety

Welcome!

Hello, MGerety, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - AKeen 17:29, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New Category

You added a new Category:Medieval and Renaissance hill towns in Italy to a lot of italian Town last night. How about Castelfidardo, Gualdo Cattaneo, Castelluccio (Norcia), Castelfidardo, Volterra, Urbino, Bevagna - and still a lot more... Have fun! —Zyance 09:16, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note "The Category "Medieval and Renaissance Hill Towns in Italy" was vandalized and somehow deleted without a trace. Some of the towns that you list were on it but I just hadn't completed putting the category back. Your help in doing so would be greatly appreciated, especially when it comes to hill towns in the North and South of Italy. I am familiar with pretty much all the hill towns within three hours of Rome. I am particularly interested in helping people discover many of the lesser known hill towns, most irreplaceable gems, that with population declines are struggling to survive and need the tourism.~~MGerety 16 March 2007

Just added Collepino for you. Have a look! Have you flipped thru my Italien galleries (on my Commons page)? from a trip to Umbria in September 2006. I look in my fotobox, if I can find some more rareties (-: In April I will go again to Umbria - any requests for photo souveniers? Zyance 16:34, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Miles, sorry that THEY didn't let you keep up the category. Short "discussion" anyway. I looked thru the newly merged page. What worries me most is that most towns are illustrated with no or only a few photos. So for most of the casual passers bye there is no way of getting an idea of the beauty of these places. I got some pictures of places in tuscany I'm not realy shure of their names anymore. Do you think you could identify when I upload them? Nice theat you are also in contact with Francesco G. Zyance

October 2007

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Maremma Sheepdog, you will be blocked for vandalism. Under no circumstances should you blank out or remove contents from a talk page unless they are completely unrelated to the subject. Your clearing of the Maremma Sheepdog talk page is a strong violation of Wikipedia policy. I have restored the original talk page before all of your edits/clearing. Collectonian 05:01, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maremma Sheepdog

Hi! Great work on trying to get this article into better shape. Might I make one suggestion, though? Please read Wikipedia:WikiProject_Dog_breeds#Recommended_article_structure to see what the appropriate sections for a dog breed article are. For consistency, its preferred that the dog breed articles use a similar sectional format. For now I've updated the article to use the sections available, but that guide should help in future edits. Thanks Collectonian 14:12, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:385507369 8d254a99d2 mBlickMontepulciano207.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:385507369 8d254a99d2 mBlickMontepulciano207.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leoboudv (talk) 08:50, 29 May 2009 (UTC) --Leoboudv (talk) 08:50, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File: 349494337 db348c295c m.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File: 349494337 db348c295c m.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leoboudv (talk) 09:01, 29 May 2009 (UTC) --Leoboudv (talk) 09:01, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:192823816 515639b387.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:192823816 515639b387.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 00:48, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:234259296 9a7593d00d mbygizax4-sept06.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:234259296 9a7593d00d mbygizax4-sept06.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:264315303 4fc6efb925 b-2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:264315303 4fc6efb925 b-2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 06:53, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:267080610 1e7452eda7SanGiminanolunatuna74.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:267080610 1e7452eda7SanGiminanolunatuna74.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 06:57, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:276551135 6cf8eac7c2Hannah212006MonteC.dvb.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:276551135 6cf8eac7c2Hannah212006MonteC.dvb.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:05, 13 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:05, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:282477788 6e5bc710efsermoneta,cosadirici.aversa2006.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:282477788 6e5bc710efsermoneta,cosadirici.aversa2006.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:35, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:San Valentino in Abruzzo Citeriore.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:San Valentino in Abruzzo Citeriore.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 16:26, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:800px-Campo Imperatore 02.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:800px-Campo Imperatore 02.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:16, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Maremma puppy.jpg

The file File:Maremma puppy.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Miles italy Aug. 2006 Porta S. Rocco.jpg

The file File:Miles italy Aug. 2006 Porta S. Rocco.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Madonna del Suffragio church (2007).jpg

The file File:Madonna del Suffragio church (2007).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:24, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:IMG CastelDelMonteSunset0700.jpg

The file File:IMG CastelDelMonteSunset0700.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:25, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Centro Storico Street 2007.jpg

The file File:Centro Storico Street 2007.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:25, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Castel Del Monte piazza.jpg

The file File:Castel Del Monte piazza.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:25, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Museum Castel Del Monte.jpg

The file File:Museum Castel Del Monte.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:26, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:IMG Brooke Nichols1839.jpg

The file File:IMG Brooke Nichols1839.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:26, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Castel Del Monte, Rua Del Muto Museum Jan 2007.jpg

The file File:Castel Del Monte, Rua Del Muto Museum Jan 2007.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:26, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Duomo,SanValentiono.jpg

The file File:Duomo,SanValentiono.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Parrocchiale di San Valentino in Abruzzo Citeriore (Pe) .jpg

The file File:Parrocchiale di San Valentino in Abruzzo Citeriore (Pe) .jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]