User talk:MIDI/2022

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:C74logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:C74logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Terras Bridge

On 16 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Terras Bridge, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that vehicles crossing Terras Bridge (pictured) pass over a tidal river, an ungated level crossing, and the remains of a canal? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Terras Bridge. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Terras Bridge), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Looe Bridge

On 18 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Looe Bridge, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the medieval Looe Bridge had either 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, or 18 arches? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Looe Bridge. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Looe Bridge), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Round house (Thames and Severn Canal)

On 2 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Round house (Thames and Severn Canal), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after viewing the Coates round house, the prospective occupant's fiancée refused to marry him unless the canal company made the property more habitable? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Round house (Thames and Severn Canal). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Round house (Thames and Severn Canal)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Aldermaston photo location layout

Good morning, I recently changed most of the locations of the photos for the page concerning Aldermaston. Thanks for your comments regarding the reversion of my changes, as never accessing Wikipeadia by mobile phone I was never aware of this having material repurcussions for mobile phone users. I have to say, I tend to do this when changing the layout as it makes the articles more reader friendly from a PC perspective, but I do have to concur your point from the perspective of a mobile user. If there is any scope for adding further relevant photos about Aldermaston then that would be great. I look forward to reading this article over the next few days though. Regards, Robin75aw (talk) 07:02, 5 February 2022 (UTC).

Hi, Robin75aw. I'm only occasionally a mobile user, so I know it's something that's easily overlooked when editing with desktop display in mind (or, at least, not with mobile view in mind!). That said, we do have reference to image placement in the Manual of Style; the relevant guideline is MOS:IMAGELOCATION. Thanks! MIDI (talk) 20:35, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ewen MacIntosh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dawn Ward.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siddington, Gloucestershire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chesterton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Siddington, Gloucestershire

On 28 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Siddington, Gloucestershire, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the lock flight (pictured) in Siddington, Gloucestershire has lain abandoned for almost 100 years, but restoration is now planned? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Siddington, Gloucestershire. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Siddington, Gloucestershire), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Hook update
Your hook reached 11,485 views (478.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2022 – nice work!

the automation of this function is in beta testing mode—please let me know if I've screwed up! theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/they) 23:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Claudia Jessie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canal boat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

  1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
  2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maud Allan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lincoln High School and Emmanuel Baptist Church.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Notice

The article Karuari has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not meeting WP:GEOLAND.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hitro talk 09:35, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Kay Mellor

On 18 May 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Kay Mellor, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:51, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fourteenth Doctor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alien.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reading, Berkshire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St Mary the Virgin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi MIDI. I noticed you replaced "took his own life" with "died by suicide", which I consider no less euphemistic, and rather indirect, as though he had little to do with the act. I have replaced it with a more accurate description and a reference. Doug butler (talk) 11:12, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Totally fine with your rewording – I don't agree that "died by suicide" is no less euphemistic, but always happy to find the compromise. I think I'd prefer something like "shooting himself in the head" as to me, "firing a bullet into his brain" sounds a little sensationalistic – but perhaps that's just me. What do you think? MIDI (talk) 11:34, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
As the author of "took his own life" and "overfond of alcohol" and happy with both, I was trying to point out the extremities to which this direction could be taken. Doug butler (talk) 05:12, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Hewani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hewani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hewani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

- Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 08:15, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Notice

The article Giakibii has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability; not every shopping centre is noteworthy enough for a standalone article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kazamzam (talk) 13:05, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Muthurua Farm for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muthurua Farm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muthurua Farm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

- Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 08:02, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Benvar Farm for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Benvar Farm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benvar Farm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kazamzam (talk) 20:13, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Gathigio for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gathigio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gathigio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kazamzam (talk) 20:16, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Notice

The article Akelo's Village has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of existence by name, legitimate and verifiable sources, or on maps per given coordinates.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kazamzam (talk) 20:30, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Makere ya Gwano for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Makere ya Gwano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Makere ya Gwano until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

- Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 02:22, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Samicha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samicha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samicha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

- Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 02:23, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Yedi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yedi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yedi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

- Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 02:25, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Waldena for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Waldena is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waldena until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

- Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 02:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Mashanda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mashanda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mashanda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

- Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 02:29, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Mugome for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mugome is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mugome until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

- Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 02:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Mwabila for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mwabila is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mwabila until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

- Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 02:34, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Gichagiini for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gichagiini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gichagiini until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

- Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 02:36, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Kaagogi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kaagogi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaagogi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

- Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 02:39, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Fifteenth anniversary on Wikipedia!


Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear MIDI/2022,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 19:44, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Time

This! Absolutely – I couldn't agree more. A bit of drama sometimes seems to do something very strange to people's brains ... cheers DBaK (talk) 08:18, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

I haven't the time (or the inclination) to go through the edit history to find when they were all added, but I have every faith they were done with the intention of improving the article. :) MIDI (talk) 08:22, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Oh yes, agree totally! No doubt at all about people's Best Intentions! :) Cheers DBaK (talk) 08:41, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
PS having looked around your pages a bit I just wanted to add how much I liked your stuff and especially your K&A connection! Best wishes DBaK (talk) 08:48, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Clinton Keeling

On 24 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Clinton Keeling, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Sugar Puffs bear once escaped from Clinton Keeling's home zoo? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Clinton Keeling. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Clinton Keeling), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello. I removed poorly sourced personal info from Clinton Keeling based on public records per WP:BLPPRIMARY because although the subject is deceased, BLP policy still apples to living (or presumably still living) family members. Do not add personal info on living people that has not been reliably published and disseminated. Birth and marriage records, as well as personal blogs, are not appropriate sources for living people. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 01:28, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Notice

The article Mararui has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

0 references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 11:11, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Wilko Johnson

On 26 November 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Wilko Johnson, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 15:07, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)