User talk:MUCHERS22
FYI[edit]
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:MUCHERS22 reported by User:Brewcrewer (Result: ) --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 23:21, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
December 2010[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:05, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
MUCHERS22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hey Im sorry for the reverting, I tried to reach out to the person who kept deleting my adds without fair reason but I never got anything back from him. But like I said Im sorry for breaching the rules and it wont happen again, I will use the discussion page in such conflicts, if I get unblocked. I find the block unecessarry since I was just ignorant enough not to pay attention to the warning I got (from another editor) !. MUCHERS22 (talk) 10:35, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have six prior blocks for edit-warring. Because you did not stop edit-warring after these six blocks, I do not believe you that you will stop if this seventh block is lifted. Sandstein 11:28, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
MUCHERS22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Well like I said I am truly sorry for what I did and that I didnt pay enough attention, I tried to reach out to the editor too but he ignored my call, what should I have done i such a position? The people deleting my stuff did it just out of spite and no reason, just look for yourself which reason they used. Yes I have been blocked before but I have finally learned my lesson, it took 6 times, for some it may just take 1. If there isnt a single way for me to get back, please remove my user then. MUCHERS22 (talk) 12:03, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
6 blocks for the same reason shows me that you're not able to learn. That said, WP:OFFER exists - in order to make use of this, I recommend you go to a different Wikimedia project and start editing properly. When you return in June, show us that you now understand the policies. As you already should know, your userid can never be deleted. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:42, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
MUCHERS22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Again for the third time, let me know how I should have handle the conclict that ended up in six mounth ban? I reached out to the user who kept deleting my stuff (which was also without fair reason), but he ignored it. What should I have done? Please tell me because I am probably going to go in to that trap over and over, and you can see my earlier discussions on the Admin message board, I was never given a fair reason on the earlier blocks neither. No wonder I do the same misstakes. Giving me a ban for six mounths without telling me the reason is vulgar, I guess you rather find my political views contradicting with yours, just like the previous ban. Also like I said, some learn after 1 time someone learn after 10 times, thats relative. But hey, sure ban me 6 mounth or 6 years, why would I care? In such case I will only use another IP and I will be back with another username. Problem solved. MUCHERS22 (talk) 15:18, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Stop being disingenuous. You were repeatedly warned; anyone can look at the history of this page and see just how many times you received warnings and simply blanked them, neither responding to them nor modifying your behavior. If you come back under another username, and continue the same behavior, the exact same result will ensue; it has nothing whatsoever to do with the content of your edits - just your flawed approach to editing Wikipedia. --jpgordon::==( o ) 15:33, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock|reason=Yes I have been warned I havent concured on that, what I havent been told i what rule breaking (that ended up in a 6 mounth ban)? You have also failed to tell me how I should have done when 1. I stopped reverting and approached the user 2. He ignored my call. How could I be punished for that action? [[User:MUCHERS22|MUCHERS22]] ([[User talk:MUCHERS22#top|talk]]) 15:37, 17 December 2010 (UTC)}}
- There's no punishment being meted out - this is all about prevention. In every warning you ever received about edit-warring or 3 reverts, you were advised about the dispute resolution process. You were even made aware of the correct noticeboard when others violate 3RR. You were even made aware of how to request page protection. Because you continually failed to heed those very nice pieces of advice, then continued to blatantly break the bright line rule again and again, we have to protect this project. Beware: your continued disingenuous unblock requests will soon result in removal of your access to this page: as already noted, if you try to WP:EVADE this block, your alternate accounts may be blocked on sight. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:04, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
MUCHERS22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Again you fail to tell me which rules I have broken, I reached out to the people who deleted my stuff without plausible reason, when they ignored my call I kept adding it, how could I get a 6 mt. ban for that? Its just ridiculous. Keep coming with your threats of cutting me off forever, that just proves my point. Another nick will just be created ad finitum. MUCHERS22 (talk) 16:23, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
"when they ignored my call I kept adding it, how could I get a 6 mt. ban for that?" Because that is edit warring, about which you have been warned very many times. Your asking this question shows that you still do not understand why you are blocked. Because you also threaten to evade your block, your talk page access is hereby removed for continuing to make clearly invalid unblock requests. You can appeal this block to WP:BASC per e-mail. Sandstein 16:45, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.