User talk:MUKUL SACHAN

November 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Astronomy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Astronomy was changed by MUKUL SACHAN (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956305 on 2016-11-21T08:16:45+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:16, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just added a question in open questions topic.. And why it got deleted? I just wanted the answer. MUKUL SACHAN (talk) 13:38, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your question was not just dleted, I moved it to a the correct place, Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions#New contents on already present topics. See my comment at the bottom of the page. -- GB fan 13:40, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No i added a question under a topic named astronomy.. There is a open question sub topic and i asked a question there and it was deleted. Why? MUKUL SACHAN (talk) 13:48, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you are talking about now. You added a question to an article. That is not where questions belong and that is why it was removed. If you want to ask a general question about astronomy the place to do that is at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science. -- GB fan 13:53, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you.. MUKUL SACHAN (talk) 14:07, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But in astronomy article there is open question sub topic.. Why my question is deleted then? And how can i ask question there? MUKUL SACHAN (talk) 14:11, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That section is for questions that astronomy in general are still trying to answer. They are not questions that editors want answered as the question you added. If you believe a question fits into the general concept of a major hole in the knowledge of the field of astronomy then it can be added there. I Would suggest you go to the talk page and propose that the question be added. You will need to provide a reliable source that says it is a major question that needs to be answered. -- GB fan 14:31, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MUKUL SACHAN, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MUKUL SACHAN! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Justeditingtoday (talk) 06:40, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why is my content deleted even if i added the topic not copied.. I also provided the website as reference.. I used that as a source of information yet my content is deleted. Why?? Please help. MUKUL SACHAN (talk) 13:36, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you read the above information from User:Justeditingtoday this person has already told you that you need to rewrite information from the web site you use as a source in your own words. Copyrighted material cannot be used, for reasons explained if you go to the above links in blue. And assuming other editors find that web site you used as a source to be an appropriate one, it would likely not have the neutral point of view required.

Also, it would be a good idea to discuss at Talk:National Institute of Technology Uttarakhand, Talk:Astronomy, Talk:Just-in-time manufacturing and Talk:Plant layout study.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moved your question

I moved your question to the appropriate page. You can now find it at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions#New contents on already present topics. -- GB fan 13:32, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No one responded to your question, so let me give it a try. As far as I can tell, you believed content was missing from the article that should be there. You can go ahead and try to add it, but be sure you have independent reliable sources that discuss the topic in some detail. We have to know that what you are adding is true. Also, make sure the edit has neutral point of view and is important enough to include. If you have a disagreement, you can discuss with other editors on the talk page of the article.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:07, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]