User talk:M i k e y 86

Welcome!

Hello, M i k e y 86, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Arnzy ^{(whats up?)} 11:56, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. DXRAW 02:08, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:130 3040.JPG[edit]

File:130 3040.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Qantas Boeing 747.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Qantas Boeing 747.JPG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:59, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009[edit]

Your recent edit to the page Canberra International Airport appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 10:58, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Canberra International Airport. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. I suggest you look at the Qantas time table which has Darwin to Canberra to start on 1 February 2010. Undo the edit again and you will be warned again. Bidgee (talk) 11:12, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SQ at HND[edit]

In fact, A month is most certainly NOT enough to have it listed. The established project guidelines are very clear on that. An actual date (not a month or a year, but a date) is essential, together with a valid source. Besides, "alot of airport wikipages most have month and year" is NOT correct; they don't. Where they do, editors routinely remove the addition as invalid, or replace with an actual date if available. Thanks, Jasepl (talk) 11:24, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Repeat above comment. Please refer to the project guidelines, that you clearly seem to be unfamiliar with. Thanks. Jasepl (talk)

Brisbane Airport[edit]

Wikipedia and the aviation Project is not about pleasantness or prettiness, unfortunately. Those are good characteristics for articles, certainly. However, there also exist project-wide standards, that are followed across airport articles; Brisbane Airport cannot be an exception for no good reason. I see you still haven't familiarised yourself with the project and its guidelines (as suggested previously). The established layout for airport articles clearly indicated the hierarchy. You may wish to familiarise yourself with it this time around. Thanks, Jasepl (talk) 16:50, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately readers will not know about this "project" and standards of "pleasantness" and "prettiness" should be up held. Reader want something that is well structed, if it isnt it makes for an unpleasant reading experience, in which the "Project" should adopt these important standards

As per your layout "statement" Brisbane Airport doesn't seem to be the only exception! Just have a look at other wikipages, Sydney Airport, Hong Kong Airport are some examples.

Note that Brisbane Airport also consideres it self an Airport-City not a City-Airport and all this information being put end the end of the page is equal to importance with Airlines and Destination.

PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE THE LAYOUT UNTIL AN AGREEMENT HAS BEEN MADE! YOU SHOULD REALLY HAVE A THINK ABOUT WHAT A READER WOULD LIKE TO SEE! A FLOW IN A ARTICLE/WIKIPAGE IS ALWAYS MOST IMPORTANT.

Again, please first familiarise yourself with the established layout for airport articles, before scranimg yourself hoarse. Thanks, Jasepl (talk) 05:07, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've been reported for edit warring at Brisbane Airport[edit]

Hello M i k e y 86. Please see WP:AN3#User:M i k e y 86 reported by Bidgee (talk) (Result: ). Your behavior does look like edit warring. "Please discuss with me before changing" makes it sound like you own the article, and others need to ask for your permission. Per WP:BRD, if your work is undone, you should hold a discussion before continuing to revert. In spite of reverting the airport article many times, you've never posted anything at Talk:Brisbane Airport. If you wish to avoid a block, it would be wise to respond to the complaint at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 03:34, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Emirates[edit]

The recent edits you made to the Emirates article have been undone. There has been long-standing consensus that detailed listings (and that includes tables) for routes starting and ending will not be included in the main airline articles, as that is basically duplication of information already available in the dedicated destinations article. Please do not add it again. If you disagree with said consensus, please bring it up for discussion at the appropriate place (ie: WP:Airlines. Jasepl (talk) 22:25, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Harveyworldtravel logo.gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Harveyworldtravel logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:39, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]