User talk:Machchunk/Archive

Personal attack

I do not appreciate being called an idiot. Please view wikipedia's polciy on No personal attacks. Thank you . And if you notice the text i had used was a merger between your re-write and what I originally had. I also heavily copy edited hte merger; it has more clarity, uniformity of syntax, and better grammar. --larsinio (poke)^(prod) 04:33, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

More on alien hominid

You really shouldnt remove content that you think doesnt fit without a larger context. I specific item can still be detailed on. It is not a good idea to remove content. If you really want it not on the page, it shoudl go on the talk page instead, until the time has come where it can be put in its proper context. However the pda minigmae, as listed in the french wikipedia article, is notable on its own wihtout necessitating a larger context. --larsinio (poke)^(prod) 04:38, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Whatever

...but I still think you butchering everything I put (which BENEFITS THE ARTICLE) is dumb.

Also you can't say you use better grammar because I think our grammar is about the same.--machchunk

Actually I noticed yours is WORSE. Look at that mess you crapped onto my talk page. You call that a paragraph? Buzz off, doof. --Machchunk

This guy clearly dislikes personal attacks, doof. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.120.213.15 (talk • contribs)

Aww, are you still leading your witlle cwusade against my supposed personal attacks?

Eh. Refer to the discussion below this one. Machchunk 21:12, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

You Have Issues...

...and you should probably take another English class. Just64helpin 15:51, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Oh, JUST because I say 'idiot' you think I have issues? No, I think YOU do. You frickken sissy.

Also, my statement still stands. LISTEN TO "MUSIQUE" AND LISTEN TO "WDPK 83.7 FM". You'll see my elaboration is completely correct AND needed. --Machchunk

"intentionally" needs to be verified. Also I believe you already understand the policy on personal attacks. I have begun the neccessary steps in making my complaints against you. Just64helpin 20:29, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

By saying that you prove that YOU do not. Read it again and you'll see it does not directly state or even indirectly that calling someone an 'idiot' is prohibited.

YOU'RE the one directing the personal attack. See where it says "no accusatory comments"? You accused me of a personal attack when I wasn't.

Psst, you're still a sissy.

Now that this has been resolved, we will not continue this discussion any further. --Machchunk

NPA

It didn't take you two hours from the end of your previous block to start back up with the personal attacks. Last warning. Learn to play nice or the blocks are only going to get longer. It's just a song... you're taking these editing conflicts way too personally. Tijuana Brass^¡Épa! 08:00, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove messages from your talk page. Talk pages exist as a record of communication, and in any case, comments are available through the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted comments. Thanks. Tijuana Brass^¡Épa! 09:00, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Then that's the problem, what if I don't want an ugly lie stinking up my talk page and ruining my reputation? --Machchunk

Your own words do that. Please try to remain civil. You might consider making your User page less confrontational, for starters. User:Zoe|^(talk) 22:36, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Hmm, no they don't. In fact I'll make a campaign. STOP THE LIES. MACHCHUNK IS YOUR FRIEEEEEEEEEND. OR AT LEAST WILL BE, UNLESS YOU SUCK. --Machchunk

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disrupting Wikipedia by making personal attacks. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Tijuana Brass^¡Épa! 04:02, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Personal....what? How? You're not telling me HOW? I need to know HOW. I don't see ANY evidence of personal attacks.--Confused

Here's a few... Profanity in edit summary: [1], responding to some friendly advice with "YOU SUCK": [2], provocative user page: [3]. This is mostly to humor you, as a cursory glance at your contribution history provides more than enough evidence of personal attacks and incivility. I'm knocking the block down to 24 hours instead of a week, which was too long, but if you can't figure out how to cool off and contribute here without calling people names, you're not going to last long. Check the links above; you should probably look at Wikipedia:Don't disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point and Wikipedia:Etiquette too. Tijuana Brass^¡Épa! 16:54, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

As far as I was able to tell after looking at NPA, I don't see anywhere it says "No insults", but I didn't notice Incivility.

But still, you saying I can't contribute well is too much. They were disputing a fact, and were pretty much ignorant to anything I was saying to convince them to stop. Machchunk 19:28, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Also, I said UNLESS "you suck". Machchunk 19:39, 1 August 2006 (UTC)