User talk:MagnificentOneee
Your message at Requests for feedback[edit]
help chat
Best regards, the Wikipedia requests for feedback team.
Very good article. Well wrote, very well explained. Reliable sources. Good for a first article.
- The above message is not accurate; it comes from User:Xoxoxjasmine, who doesn't appear to be familiar with Wikipedia. I apologize if the above message was confusing for you; I've left a warning on that user's talk page, reminding him to wait until she is more familiar with the rules before reviewing articles. I looked at the article, and couldn't find any reliable sources in it- just links to the subject's own web pages. I see that User:NawlinWiki has already given you the links to Wikipedia's notability criteria and reliable source guidelines; that should be the information you need to determine whether or not this subject is a useful one for a Wikipedia article. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:11, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
The article Stacey Gurnevich has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:44, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- I just didn't see anything in the article that indicated that Ms. Gurnevich meets the notability standards of WP:BIO. I don't think "being searched for on Google" qualifies. Also, there weren't any independent sources cited that discuss Ms. Gurnevich or indicate her notability, see WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:31, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Stacee.JPG[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stacee.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --(ESkog)(Talk) 22:19, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
