User talk:Magnvss
[
- You shouldn't delete your User_talk pages (User page#How do I delete my user talk pages?). If you want to clean up your main user_talk page, you should archive it. Mind you, it isn't a rule per se, just the proper convention. If you should find yourself moving up in the project later on (e.g. requesting adminship), then this could work against you. — NRen2k5(TALK), 20:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. You have reverted twice the corrections I've made to the summary table, which is not accurate in its current version. I'd like to hear from you the reasons. These are mine's: if you are able to read Spanish, the source provided clearly states that a 12-month ban applies for “Varones que tengan o hayan tenido relaciones entre hombres”, among others. In plain words, men who have sex with men are allowed to donate blood, subject to a 12-month ban. This is not what your edits claim. Besides that, the right in the summary table should read “Men who have sex with men allowed to donate blood”, and not “Men who have sex with men NOT allowed to donate blood” which is clearly not a right.--Jetstreamer (talk) 23:47, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
I’m going to leave the English language for the general discussion, given that you purportedly manifest to understand Spanish with the required level.
Tus palabras se contradicen con mucha claridad: lo que la norma aclara y establece es la negación factual de donar sangre a (y cito el punto octavo en su veda anual) “Varones que tengan o hayan tenido relaciones entre hombres.” Es decir, vos no podés hablar de que se les permite donar sangre a los varones que tienen sexo con hombre mientras NO tengan sexo con hombres. Es como decir que te permiten ser judío mientras no practiques el judaísmo. Eso tiene una consecuencia práctica que es la inhabilitación de donar independientemente de cualquier consideración de salud o de estatus marital o cuidados que tome la persona simplemente por ser gay, bisexual o transexual. Algo que NO se le exige a un varón heterosexual. Por lo tanto el marcador es rojo, por la negativa. En la práctica –por ejemplo- un varón NO PUEDE donar a SU propio ESPOSO, aunque goce de perfecto estado de salud, dado que su estatus matrimonial impide el cumplimiento permanente de la veda anual por simple presunción, teniendo como efecto una prohibición de facto, no aplicable para un matrimonio de hombre y mujer. En consecuencia el marcador debe ser NEGATIVO (no puede donar) y sirve la aclaración de que “Sólo podrá donar si declara que no ha tenido relación con hombres por al menos un año”, es decir que ha ABANDONADO toda relación sexual posible y practicable por una persona de su orientación, no importando otras consideraciones.
Argentina stats
[edit]It seems to be a problem, as usual with the ethnicity stats. In my humble opinion, the former stats are properly written and stated by reliable sources as per WP:RS, and unlike the current one entirely stated and cited on Latinobarometro survey on public opinion. I'm not saying that we have to delete this information from Wikipedia, I'm saying that in order to renominate Argentina as a good article and meet the good article criteria is better to state possible controversial data on a non-GA page. --Fercho85 (talk) 19:21, 27 May 2012 (UTC)