User talk:Maha kalu sinhalaya

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ehelepola Nilame. Getting an account does not change the fact that you are removing sourced content and adding content that is unsourced. No wp:cite, don't add. No good reason for removal in the wp:ES, don't remove. A wp:OR claim is insufficient per wp:verifiability. Adakiko (talk) 20:02, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is that a threat? are you saying referencing Dalada Maligawa Page isnt sufficient to make changes. Pretty sure Dalada Maligawa knows more about ehelepola Wijesundara than anyone.I suggest you stick to what you know and leave the rest to the experts. Maha kalu sinhalaya (talk) 23:36, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I stated on User talk:219.88.174.245, the wp:BURDEN is on you to cite sources. I and other editors are not going to traipse across the series of tubes to verify your claim. Adakiko (talk) 23:46, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Four people have disagreed with your edit. Need more evidence about your editing style? Adakiko (talk) 00:09, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 22:05, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Something to consider[edit]

Well, this is regrettable. 😐 Some suggestions to avoid this happening again can be found in messages left by editors which can be found in your talk page's history tab. Also, please avoid treating Wikipedia like a battleground. You were warned that this could end with a block. I would recommend that you do not resume edit warring and addition of improperly sourced content after this block expires, as the next one will likely be either much longer, or indefinite. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 14:48, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]