User talk:Maharani303

Refs

Please use secondary sources per WP:MEDRS Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 11:06, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

fibromyalgia

Hi Jmh649 seems like the format I used for these 2 references was not correct. Both references are from Medline-indexed journals with a high impact factor. Can you help me further? This is my 3rd Wiki contribution, therefore I am quite new to this. Much thanks Maharani303

Certainly, for major medicine topics we require secondary sources generally. These include review articles, major position statements, and major textbooks. WP:MEDHOW will help with formatting. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 09:19, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your additions to Ida P. Rolf

Hello - thanks for your quality additions. I would note that websites, especially those published within the field that the article pertains to, are considered poor sources. Don't be surprised if your edits are removed because of this. The solution is to find published sources. Books are best, and magazines/journals/newspapers are also good - provided the publisher is relatively neutral and mainstream. In the meantime, keep editing, and don't get discouraged if some of your edits get reverted. There's an uphill learning process at first but it pays off quickly. --Karinpower (talk) 03:43, 14 October 2014 (UTC)--Karinpower (talk) 03:35, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fascia Training has been accepted

Fascia Training, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:29, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Schleip (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Maharani303/Robert Schleip and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Flat Out (talk) 11:18, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Schleip (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines for academics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert Schleip and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 20:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Robert Schleip has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Robert Schleip. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:32, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Schleip (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert Schleip and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:52, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Maharani303, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:52, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible conflict of Interest

Since you have edited only on the theory Fascia Training, and the draft article on its proponent Robert Schleip, I think it quite possible that you have a WP:Conflict of Interest. If so, the article ralk page must be labelled with the template {{Connected contributor}}. If this in any way involves money--for example if you work for him, or his foundation, or are writing a paid article at his request, you need to declare it--see our Terms of Use, particularly with respect to paid contributions without disclosure . The Templateto use in this case is {{Connected contributor (paid)}}. DGG ( talk ) 16:57, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Robert Schleip has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Robert Schleip. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 18:18, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Robert Schleip concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Robert Schleip, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:11, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robert Schleip

Hello, Maharani303. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Robert Schleip".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 11:21, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Drehmann sign has been accepted

Drehmann sign, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fuortu (talk) 11:06, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robert Schleip

Hello, Maharani303. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Robert Schleip".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 23:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]