User talk:Maizie007

March 2022[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to David Pearson (computer scientist) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: David Pearson (computer scientist) was changed by Maizie007 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.923627 on 2022-03-14T02:41:56+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:41, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maizie007, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 02:50, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary to articles, as you did at David Pearson (computer scientist). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to discuss the article, please use Talk:David Pearson (computer scientist). Thank you. 💜 melecie talk - 03:14, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BUT IT IS NOW RUBBISH AND FALSE. THE RECENT EDITORS HAVE INVALIDATED IT. PLEASE JUST DELETE THE ENTIRE ARTICLE, OR IS WIKIPEDIA HAPPY TO PUBLISH FALSE INFORMATION? PLEASE RESPOND TO THIS BEFORE I HAVE TO TAKE FURTHER CORRECTIVE ACTION. Maizie007 (talk) 03:21, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

please forward discussion on this false information to Talk:David Pearson (computer scientist) where you can explain why is it false, instead of just stating that "the entire article is bad" in the article itself, so that we may be able to help clean up the article 💜 melecie talk - 03:33, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Poolroadrunner per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Poolroadrunner. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- TNT (talk • she/her) 04:49, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]