User talk:Makar.91

Your submission at Articles for creation: Betinvest (June 15)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Blatant advert

Theroadislong (talk) 08:30, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Makar.91! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 08:30, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 08:04, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

January 2024

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Makar.91 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

At 2019 one of my clients asked me to add information about their company on wiki, because there already was articles about their companies-competitors with similar age and fame/notability (playtech, everymatrix, etc). I've placed the article with information quite close in value as it already was on wiki (basic company information — what are they doing, when they where founded, their achievements, etc.). And when I started a discussion about that article, I didn't denied my relations with the company. And because it was my firs contribution on English version (I make more contributions as a native speaker of Ukrainian and russian languages versions correspondingly. At the moment I want to update the article about my current employee (NGO hromadske) because some of it is out of date (change logo after rebranding) or submitted incorrect interpretation of 3-rd party source. And to prevent such a situation, I familiarized myself with articles "What Wikipedia is not" and "Template:Connected contributor" Makar.91 (talk) 10:48, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You've demonstrated you are not capable of doing so appropriately. You will not be unblocked to do so. If this is your only goal, this is the end of the line. If instead, you wish to write about subject areas for which you have no conflict of interest, tell us how specifically you would comply with WP:COI and what subject areas you would write about instead. Yamla (talk) 11:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Makar.91 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sorry, with due respect, but I do not fully understand such criticality. I'm not behaving as some of my colleagues by profession. I know a pretty few ways to link build on targeted pages so that moderators wouldn't suspect it, if needed — from buying on specified sites from guys with pumped accounts or building such a "troll farm" myself through a proxy, etc. But I don't think, that wiki is a link dumpster or bulletin board, etc. I've never had paid for posting links on wiki or make some attractive image through it (such as SERM). I've not tried to hide something, be sly, or behave similarly. Did I break the rules in 2019? Yeah, because then I didn't know about the rule of indication of my affiliation with the owner. Unfortunately, I didn't discuss this accident in 2019 so I could appellate to the article format and its contents that it wasn't written in an advertisement way with a hundred links in it, but in an informative way for company representation in the same way as their competitors. It was a big old company, that worked on the international market and represented itself at different world conferences, as it is now. I think that an article about Betinvest will be added to the wiki sooner or later, because other companies of that holding, which Betinvest is a part of, are already represented in the English wiki. And that was my very first contribution on English wiki and I've got banned without any warnings or discussions. At the moment I don't have any intention to make link building on Hromadske to boost it or advertise it. I just want to update information about it — that it was transformed from a TV broadcasting station to a multimedia online independent media, and went through rebranding. Also, update information about some other media — some already closed up, some continue to develop in bigger media holdings, etc. I perfectly understand that furtherer this account definitely would be marked up in some way as one, that already made a violation in the past and my edits would be checked more meticulously. I'm trying to follow rules, not go through some shady schemes using other people

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= Sorry, with due respect, but I do not fully understand such criticality. I'm not behaving as some of my colleagues by profession. I know a pretty few ways to link build on targeted pages so that moderators wouldn't suspect it, if needed — from buying on specified sites from guys with pumped accounts or building such a "troll farm" myself through a proxy, etc. But I don't think, that wiki is a link dumpster or bulletin board, etc. I've never had paid for posting links on wiki or make some attractive image through it (such as [[Search engine reputation management|SERM]]). I've not tried to hide something, be sly, or behave similarly. Did I break the rules in 2019? Yeah, because then I didn't know about the rule of indication of my affiliation with the owner. Unfortunately, I didn't discuss this accident in 2019 so I could appellate to the article format and its contents that it wasn't written in an advertisement way with a hundred links in it, but in an informative way for company representation in the same way as their competitors. It was a big old company, that worked on the international market and represented itself at different world conferences, as it is now. I think that an article about Betinvest will be added to the wiki sooner or later, because other companies of that holding, which Betinvest is a part of, are already represented in the English wiki. And that was my very first contribution on English wiki and I've got banned without any warnings or discussions. At the moment I don't have any intention to make link building on [[Hromadske]] to boost it or advertise it. I just want to update information about it — that it was transformed from a TV broadcasting station to a multimedia online independent media, and went through rebranding. Also, update information about some other media — some already closed up, some continue to develop in bigger media holdings, etc. I perfectly understand that furtherer this account definitely would be marked up in some way as one, that already made a violation in the past and my edits would be checked more meticulously. I'm trying to follow rules, not go through some shady schemes using other people |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= Sorry, with due respect, but I do not fully understand such criticality. I'm not behaving as some of my colleagues by profession. I know a pretty few ways to link build on targeted pages so that moderators wouldn't suspect it, if needed — from buying on specified sites from guys with pumped accounts or building such a "troll farm" myself through a proxy, etc. But I don't think, that wiki is a link dumpster or bulletin board, etc. I've never had paid for posting links on wiki or make some attractive image through it (such as [[Search engine reputation management|SERM]]). I've not tried to hide something, be sly, or behave similarly. Did I break the rules in 2019? Yeah, because then I didn't know about the rule of indication of my affiliation with the owner. Unfortunately, I didn't discuss this accident in 2019 so I could appellate to the article format and its contents that it wasn't written in an advertisement way with a hundred links in it, but in an informative way for company representation in the same way as their competitors. It was a big old company, that worked on the international market and represented itself at different world conferences, as it is now. I think that an article about Betinvest will be added to the wiki sooner or later, because other companies of that holding, which Betinvest is a part of, are already represented in the English wiki. And that was my very first contribution on English wiki and I've got banned without any warnings or discussions. At the moment I don't have any intention to make link building on [[Hromadske]] to boost it or advertise it. I just want to update information about it — that it was transformed from a TV broadcasting station to a multimedia online independent media, and went through rebranding. Also, update information about some other media — some already closed up, some continue to develop in bigger media holdings, etc. I perfectly understand that furtherer this account definitely would be marked up in some way as one, that already made a violation in the past and my edits would be checked more meticulously. I'm trying to follow rules, not go through some shady schemes using other people |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= Sorry, with due respect, but I do not fully understand such criticality. I'm not behaving as some of my colleagues by profession. I know a pretty few ways to link build on targeted pages so that moderators wouldn't suspect it, if needed — from buying on specified sites from guys with pumped accounts or building such a "troll farm" myself through a proxy, etc. But I don't think, that wiki is a link dumpster or bulletin board, etc. I've never had paid for posting links on wiki or make some attractive image through it (such as [[Search engine reputation management|SERM]]). I've not tried to hide something, be sly, or behave similarly. Did I break the rules in 2019? Yeah, because then I didn't know about the rule of indication of my affiliation with the owner. Unfortunately, I didn't discuss this accident in 2019 so I could appellate to the article format and its contents that it wasn't written in an advertisement way with a hundred links in it, but in an informative way for company representation in the same way as their competitors. It was a big old company, that worked on the international market and represented itself at different world conferences, as it is now. I think that an article about Betinvest will be added to the wiki sooner or later, because other companies of that holding, which Betinvest is a part of, are already represented in the English wiki. And that was my very first contribution on English wiki and I've got banned without any warnings or discussions. At the moment I don't have any intention to make link building on [[Hromadske]] to boost it or advertise it. I just want to update information about it — that it was transformed from a TV broadcasting station to a multimedia online independent media, and went through rebranding. Also, update information about some other media — some already closed up, some continue to develop in bigger media holdings, etc. I perfectly understand that furtherer this account definitely would be marked up in some way as one, that already made a violation in the past and my edits would be checked more meticulously. I'm trying to follow rules, not go through some shady schemes using other people |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}