Jump to content

User talk:Malachi456

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Let me know what you think

William Branham[edit]

With your recent edit of William M. Branham, I think we should have consistency - either we can go with the direct quote as it is in the KJV, or we can go with what WMB says in the linked sermon - at the moment it is a hybrid. I'll leave it to you to decide which you prefer.Rev107 (talk) 09:49, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the link to VGR stating there was an estimated 750,000 believers in the Congo because it no longer directs readers to the correct page, since the new VGR website came online. (I placed the original reference.) If you have a reference for the estimated 2,000,000 believers then I think it would be good to add it to the article. Rev107 (talk) 03:40, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I notice you have changed some of the references to "Branham" in the article to "William Branham". Do you think the use of his last name only is disrespectful? I always speak of him as Brother Branham or William Branham, but in an encyclopedia article (which this is) the convention is to use only the last name. Brother Branham himself often referred to Luther and Wesley without using their first names, and I am sure he was not being disrespectful. On his grave stone, in the list of 7 messengers, his name is given simply as "Branham". Rev107 (talk) 06:27, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason?[edit]

Why does the ramona in your new article Harry romana not have a capped letter R. Just curious. Moriori 03:50, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, just a mistake. You can change that. Malachi456 21:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Harry romana, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Harry romana. You may remove the deletion notice, but note that the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria.

The article Gospel Way Outreach has been nominated for deletion. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gospel Way Outreach. TedFrank 12:59, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop promoting Ruby Muhammad as a 'validated' case when the evidence shows she is not really 110 years old.Ryoung122 17:11, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]