User talk:Mamta dhody

Welcome!

Hello, Mamta dhody, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Sherool (talk) 10:41, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Ajit Jogi.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ajit Jogi.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:41, 2 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 10:41, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ajit jogi.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ajit jogi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat 15:15, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Scan_0013.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Scan_0013.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:14, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ajit Jogi.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Ajit Jogi.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 18:43, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dome of the Rock

Your edits on Dome of the Rock are not helpful. My favorite picture was removed! :-( Chesdovi (talk) 20:34, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Ajit Jogi.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Ajit Jogi.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:54, 17 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 21:54, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Ajit Jogi.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Ajit Jogi.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J Milburn (talk) 21:04, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Manu-Sharma.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Manu-Sharma.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Sdrtirs (talk) 22:59, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple issues

Firstly, I have removed your additions on Rahul Gandhi. The infobox criteria for "office" refers to a governmental official post held by the politician and not his post in the political party. Also make sure you use proper sources while referencing your information.

Secondly, I notice you have uploaded multiple images with incorrect or unspecified copyright status. This would almost definitely lead to their deletion. Make sure you refer to Wikipedia's image upload policies to understand criteria for images that can be uploaded and what sort of details need to be given.

Thirdly, user page articles are means of communication with other editors, and I think your page kind of misses this point and might be a violation.

Please rectify your aforementioned errors. Thanks and happy editing. LeaveSleaves (talk) 02:20, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Despite my earlier notice you continue to add information on the said article. Please stop these nonconstructive edits. LeaveSleaves (talk) 21:59, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Lal Murder Case and Ajit Jogi ;former CM of Chhattisgarh and close confidante of Late Shri Rajiv Gandhiji

I don't want delete any image! In this case, this image is a fair use and is orphan. It must be linked in an article, but I'm not familiarized with the subject, I don't know where to link. Regards, Sdrtirs (talk) 15:23, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Ajit Jogi.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ajit Jogi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 21:00, 23 August 2008 (UTC) --J Milburn (talk) 21:00, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Um, thanks for the link? :-)

Not quite sure what to make of this. I'm going to guess (and forgive me if I'm wrong) that it's got to do with a bunch of red links I removed from a list earlier today, is that right? Red linked names on lists of 'notable' people are kind of a problem area - they're harder to verify, for a start, and they tend to encourage every passing editor put their Mom/best friend/Next door neighbor on the list. If you think Ms. Shergil is notable, it'd be great for you to write a cited article on her and re-add her! -- Vary | Talk 21:39, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:J Milburn, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 13:22, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ajit Jogi

Please stop reverting me. Not only is it considered extremely impolite to revert without comment, (and vandalise user-talk pages for that matter) but the content is unsourced (contrary to our policies on verifiability, original research and reliable sources, and, as some of the information is negative, contrary to our policy on biographies of living people- which is very important) and a lot of it is extremely trivial (see WP:UNDUE and WP:TRIVIA). You're also undoing some of the formatting fixes I have made- see the manual of style. The image is blatantly non-free, and it's use contravenes our non-free content guidelines, and the fact you are trying to claim it is free is very worrying. I also advise you to bare in mind that we have what is known as the three revert rule. J Milburn (talk) 13:42, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have sources, cite them clearly. If you add back that unsourced 'controversy' section again, I will block you for violations of our policy on biographies of living people. J Milburn (talk) 13:47, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've failed to heed J Milburn's warning about BLP. I've blocked you for 48 hours to prevent more harm done. Maxim (☎) 13:53, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have just been blocked for failing to discuss changes, choosing to edit war instead, and ignoring our policies on living people, non-free content, sourcing, trivial information and formatting. As soon as you come back, you start reverting again. I ask you to stop, now. If you continue in this way, you will find yourself blocked permanently. I ask you to instead discuss proposed changes on the article talk page. J Milburn (talk) 13:39, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again, this time for a week. You've been repeatedly asked to respect our policy on biographies of living people and editwarring. If you persists after the block expires, the next block will be indefinite. Maxim (☎) 14:03, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Rahul in Nepal Flowers.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Rahul in Nepal Flowers.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 14:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Times of India shows Manu Siddhartha Sharma.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Times of India shows Manu Siddhartha Sharma.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 14:08, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bokaro Steel City

Hi,

The CISF conflict is not such a big chapter of history of bokaro. Most of the younger generation has never heard of it. Others have heard it from the parents. If you want to extend it, please do so in the separate article CISF conflict at Bokaro created for the same. Please have a neutral POV on this issue. --Sandyiit (talk) 16:11, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Manu Sharma

That reversion was completely unwarranted. The article has been vastly improved- reverting to a version which has serious BLP and NPOV violations, is peppered with deleted images and does not have the AfD notice is completely unacceptable- especially without an edit summary. Please do not do that again. If you are unable to edit within our BLP limitations, perhaps you should recurse yourself from such controversial articles. J Milburn (talk) 22:00, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Times of India Manu Siddhartha Sharma.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Times of India Manu Siddhartha Sharma.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J Milburn (talk) 15:55, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Despite warnings, you continue to flout our policies on non-free content and the biographies of living people policy. Continue, and you will be blocked from editing. Consider this your last warning. J Milburn (talk) 16:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Motherfucker worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox or show preview button. Thank you. 04:11, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Manu Sharma

When making changes to articles, please provide reliable sources to back up your claims- your own knowledge is not acceptable as a source. Further, if you are personally involved in a case, it is recommended that you avoid editing the subject matter. It is also worth noting the policy regarding biographies of living people. Finally, it is strongly reccomended that you do not make use of legal language on Wikipedia- Wikipedia has a strict policy against legal threats, and any legalese could be construed as a legal threat. If you have any questions, you are welcome to contact me on my talk page. J Milburn (talk) 20:41, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you believe I am being "personally malicious", you are welcome to raise the issue with me on my talk page. If you want to make controversial edits to biographies of living people, please learn to cite your sources in a standard way. Further, if you are at all involved in the case, I would strongly reccomend that you do not become involved in the editing of the article, as you may have a serious conflict of interest regarding the issue. J Milburn (talk) 21:22, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look, learn to cite your sources and learn to respect our policy regarding the biographies of living people, or do not contribute. Be warned- if you revert again, you will be blocked for a violation of the three revert rule. J Milburn (talk) 21:32, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

The recent edit you made has been reverted, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Acroterion _(talk) 21:23, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not post court transcripts: Wikipedia is not a webhost. It is acceptable to link to the subject if necessary, but copy/paste is not permitted. Acroterion _(talk) 21:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as CRLA 179/2007, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Yourname (talk) 21:27, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Acroterion _(talk) 21:35, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for violation of the three-revert rule, restrictions on editing of biographies of living persons, and inappropriate posting of material for which you have no permission to reproduce. Please take this time to read and understand Wikipedia's requirements for editors, and to learn to use the talk page to achieve consensus rather than reverting and hurling accusations at editors who are following policy. Acroterion _(talk) 21:38, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've unblocked you, and offer my sincere apology for misunderstanding the circumstances concerning Manu Sharma. I understand your frustration with referencing standards, and ask that you request help in such circumstances. An edit summary along the lines of "I'm having trouble with a reference, please help", along with a discussion on the article talk page would yield a better article and a positive experience for you as well. Again, I am sorry for the misunderstanding in this matter. Acroterion _(talk) 12:03, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're extremely lucky to be getting another chance. Read the policies linked above, and don't expect to get away with such blatant violations of them (specifically, copyvios, refusing to cite sources on a BLP and edit warring) again. I am going to be watching your edits in the future, and I will not hesitate to block you if you again defile the encyclopedia. J Milburn (talk) 22:15, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 20:00, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:"Acquire knowledge for the sake of gaining knowledge and not for your own mean personal gain or wealth"

I have no idea what you are talking about. J Milburn (talk) 21:08, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Easter rollbacks

Your changes to Easter seem to be rollbacks to some old version. I don't see any correlation between the link in your last edit summary and the changes. If you feel something needs to be changed, best to describe the change you'd like to see on Talk:Easter. --Ed Brey (talk) 00:41, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

Despite my previous request, your user page still contains inappropriate content that is in violation of WP:User page. Please remove this at the earliest, otherwise I would have to request deletion of your user page. ^LeaveSleaves 23:08, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding those images to Ajit Jogi. Those are blatant copyright violations and you know it. And once again, clean up your user page. ^LeaveSleaves 06:34, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

18-6-2009. Osama Bin Laden is a civil engineer by proffession and belongs to the Laden family assigned the task of religious construction in Mecca and Medina -the shrine of Muslim caste.He is a criminal wanted around the globe for the persecution of millions of innocent God fearing people as well as breaking their places of worship.He is also the mastermind behind Organized crime in India and America -what is symbolic to Arabian petrol and vehicles run by them-CARLOS THE KILLER.He was the mastermind behind the assassination of Kennedy family-starting from- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy on a muslim religiously significant date ,for criminal intidimation of the masses as is written in their Koran:- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Qur'an http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_extremist_terrorism 008.012 YUSUFALI: Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instil terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them." PICKTHAL: When thy Lord inspired the angels, (saying): I am with you. So make those who believe stand firm. I will throw fear into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Then smite the necks and smite of them each finger. SHAKIR: When your Lord revealed to the angels: I am with you, therefore make firm those who believe. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestine_Liberation_Organization Statements made by members of the PLO On fighting against Israel: "We plan to eliminate the state of Israel and establish a purely Palestinian state. We will make life unbearable for Jews by psychological warfare and population explosion... We Palestinians will take over everything, including all of Jerusalem ." -- Yasser Arafat, Chairman of the PLO (in front of an Arab audience in Stockholm in 1996) "Whoever thinks of stopping the uprising before it achieves its goals, I will give him ten bullets in the chest." --Yasser Arafat, Chairman of the PLO

“John Fitzgerald "Jack" Kennedy (May 29, 1917 – November 22, 1963), often referred to by his initials JFK, was the 35th President of the United States, serving from 1961 until his assassination in 1963.” Islam started in 622- so 22 number was used. As India is a world power and Kennedy had vowed to eliminate organized crime along with Nehruji of India ,both were killed on religiously significant dates-22 and 27.Islamic terrorism was fought over by Chattrapati Shivaji in India and his birth date is 1627.so number 27 was used.Both was for criminal intidimation.The Builder mafis in India along with many corporates are in league with this crime especially against women and children,as women are the upkeepers of religion and culture in a household in India.It is not new as General Dyer (symbolic to men who dye their hair and get married in old age to convert to Islam,subsequently Arya Samaj in India) ,on 13th April 1919 ,had killed many people in the well of Jallian wala bagh in Amritsar.This crime is patent of the Britishers who came to India as East India company ,and the country was betrayed by the menial class as well as people who use them for money-the Banias and Jains-merchant class. Ajit jogi’s car accident was in league with this list of crimes and it would be relevant to let these images remain for the welfare of humanity.

Last warning for copyright violations

If you continue to force copyright violations into articles, or upload any non-free material here as your own work, you will be blocked from editing. Wikipedia takes copyright seriously, and a failure to do the same completely undermines the goals of the project. J Milburn (talk) 16:02, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations, edit-warring

You were unblocked because there appeared to be misunderstanding concerning Manu Sharma. You were warned at the time for edit-warring and posting of copyrighted material. You may not take pictures of copyrighted material and post it on Wikipedia. Running a copyrighted image through a camera does not make it any less copyrighted. Your comments in edit summaries and elsewhere do not indicate that you understand this. Further edit-warring in this matter will result in a block without further warning. Acroterion _(talk) 16:32, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Famous Quotes Reference given

Again, I can't really make head or tail of that. I'm assuming you're talking about this edit, but those quotes were not referenced, and QuotesDaddy is not a reliable source anyway. J Milburn (talk) 16:53, 18 June 2009 (UTC) I have not included a single copy -material in my edits-there are my own contributions from original source!59.178.45.100 (talk) 08:59, 19 June 2009 (UTC) I have nothing against any religion in particular and it is you who are saying these things.Whatever I have said is from the religious books of the culprits themselves and the wrong knowledge that they have put to use in these modern times for criminal activities.As far as I know the general tone of Wikipedia is aginst heinous crime.If someone uses their religion to perpetrate crime on a mass scale ,it has to be brought to the notice of the general mileau and are termed as crimes against humanity and human rights violations. My edits to Subhash Chandra Bose are genuine and enriching and you have only served to deprive the readers of genuine knowledge.Sorry to have offended one person at the cost of saving so many lives.Mamta dhody (talk) 09:15, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever I have said is from the religious books of the culprits themselves and the wrong knowledge that they have put to use in these modern times for criminal activities.

I have nothing against any religion in particular and it is you who are saying these things.Whatever I have said is from the religious books of the culprits themselves and the wrong knowledge that they have put to use in these modern times for criminal activities.As far as I know the general tone of Wikipedia is aginst heinous crime.If someone uses their religion to perpetrate crime on a mass scale ,it has to be brought to the notice of the general mileau and are termed as crimes against humanity and human rights violations. My edits to Subhash Chandra Bose are genuine and enriching and you have only served to deprive the readers of genuine knowledge.Sorry to have offended one person at the cost of saving so many lives.Mamta dhody (talk) 09:17, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

The tone of Wikipedia is neutral, not for or against anything- "heinous crime" or otherwise. The only edits I have made to that article are to remove unreferenced material (QuoteDaddy is not a reliable source, as I have said) and remove copyright violations. You have continued to force copyright violations into the page, which is not acceptable, and you have been given a last warning not to do that. I am therefore blocking your account indefinitely. You have not aided the encyclopedia in any way with your edit warring, copyright violations and refusal to accept our guidelines on sourcing. As ever, you are welcome to request an unblock via the {{unblock}} template. J Milburn (talk) 12:38, 19 June 2009 (UTC) Thank you!As you wish. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.178.152.7 (talk) 18:09, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not going to unblock you at this time. You are welcome to request an unblock through the use of the {{unblock}} template. J Milburn (talk) 09:43, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Desh Premee (1982)-Uttam Kumar

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uttam_Kumar I would like to edit this page but Mr.J.Milburn has blocked me.He can put my pages out of Wikipedia also.Its unethical.We have the history section in wikipedia and it can serve as deletion mode-without blocking a person.Please note:- See Filmography of Uttam Kumar

1948 ---- Dristidan 1949 ---- Kamona 1950 ---- Marjada 1951 ---- Sahajatri 1951 ---- Nastanir 1951 ---- O re Jatri 1952 ---- Sanjeevani 1952 ---- Kaar Paape 1952 ---- Basu Paribar 1953 ---- Saare Chuattor 1953 ---- Lakh Taka 1953 ---- Bou Thakuranir Haat 1953 ---- Nabin Jatra 1954 ---- Maraner Pare 1954 ---- Ora Thake Odhare 1954 ---- Chapadangar Bou 1954 ---- Annapurnar Mandir 1954 ---- Agnipariksha 1954 ---- Maner Mayur 1954 ---- Grihaprabesh 1954 ---- Bakul 1954 ---- Mantrashakti 1954 ---- Kalyani 1955 ---- Raikamal 1955 ---- Saajher Pradip 1955 ---- Debatra 1955 ---- Anupama 1956 ---- Saheb Bibi Golam 1956 ---- Sanakr Narayan Bank 1956 ---- Sagarika 1956 ---- Chirakumar Sabha 1956 ---- Ekti Raat 1956 ---- Shyamali 1956 ---- Lakshaheera 1956 ---- Trijama 1956 ---- Putrabadhu 1956 ---- Shilpi 1956 ---- Nabajanma 1957 ---- Haranu Sur 1957 ---- Prithibi Amare Chay 1957 ---- Baradidi 1957 ---- Surer Parash 1957 ---- Jatra Holo Suru 1957 ---- Tasher Ghar 1957 ---- Punarmilan 1957 ---- Chandranath 1957 ---- Abhayer Biye 1957 ---- Pathe Holo Deri 1957 ---- Harjeet 1957 ---- Jeeban Trishna 1958 ---- Indrani 1958 ---- Bandhu 1958 ---- Joutuk 1958 ---- Shikar 1958 ---- Suryatoran 1958 ---- Rajlakshmi O Srikanta 1958 ---- Manmoyee Girls School 1958 ---- Daktarbabu 1959 ---- Marutirtha Hinglaj 1959 ---- Chaowa Pawoa 1959 ---- Bicharak 1959 ---- Sonar Harin 1959 ---- Pushpadhanu 1959 ---- Gali Theke Rajpath 1959 ---- Khelaghar 1959 ---- Abak Prithibi 1960 ---- Khokababur Pratyabartan 1960 ---- Haat Baralei Bandhu 1960 ---- Mayamriga 1960 ---- Kuhak 1960 ---- Rajasaja 1960 ---- Sakher Chor 1960 ---- Uttar Megh 1960 ---- Saharer Itikatha 1960 ---- Shuno Baranari 1961 ---- Jhinder Bandi 1961 ---- Saptapadi 1961 ---- Dui Bhai 1961 ---- Saathihara 1961 ---- Agnisanskar 1961 ---- Neckless 1962 ---- Bipasha 1962 ---- Kanna 1962 ---- Siulibari 1963 ---- Bhrantibilas 1963 ---- Suryasikha 1963 ---- Deya Neya 1963 ---- Nisithe 1963 ---- Sesh Anka 1963 ---- Uttarayan 1964 ---- Jatugriha 1964 ---- Laal Pathar 1964 ---- Momer Alo 1964 ---- Bibhas 1964 ---- Natun Tirtha 1965 ---- Thana Theke Aaschhi 1965 ---- Raajkanya 1965 ---- Suryatapa 1966 ---- Nayak 1966 ---- Sankhabela 1966 ---- Kaal Tumi Aleya 1966 ---- Shudhu Ekti Bachhar 1966 ---- Rajadrohi 1967 ---- Naayika Sangbad 1967 ---- Chiriakhana 1967 ---- Anthoni Phiringi 1967 ---- Jeeban Mrityu 1968 ---- Teen Adhyay 1968 ---- Chowrangee 1968 ---- Kakhano Megh 1968 ---- Garh Nasimpur 1969 ---- Chirodiner 1969 ---- Sabarmati 1969 ---- Man Niye 1969 ---- Aparichito 1969 ---- Shuksari 1969 ---- Kamallata 1970 ---- Nishipadma 1970 ---- Bilambita Loy 1970 ---- Duti Mon 1970 ---- Rajkumari 1970 ---- Kalankita Nayak 1970 ---- Manjari Apera 1971 ---- Chhadmabesi 1971 ---- Joyjayanti 1971 ---- Ekhane Pinjor 1971 ---- Dhannyi Meye 1971 ---- Jiban Jiggasa 1971 ---- Nabaraag 1972 ---- Memsaheb 1972 ---- Andha Atit 1972 ---- Biraj Bou 1972 ---- Alo Amar Alo 1972 ---- Stree 1972 ---- Haar Mana Haar 1972 ---- Chhinnapatra 1973 ---- Sonar Khacha 1973 ---- Bonpalashir Padabali 1973 ---- Raudrachhaya 1973 ---- Raater Rajanigandha 1973 ---- Kayaheener Kaahini 1974 ---- Amanush 1974 ---- Bikele Bhorer Phul 1974 ---- Raktatilak 1974 ---- Jadi Jantem 1974 ---- Alor Thikana 1974 ---- Jadibangsha 1974 ---- Rodan Bhara Basanta 1975 ---- Agniswar 1975 ---- Mouchak 1975 ---- Kajallata 1975 ---- Ami Se O Sakha 1975 ---- Nagar Darparne 1975 ---- Priyo Bandhabi 1976 ---- Banhisikha 1976 ---- Nidhiram Sardar 1976 ---- Hotel Snow Fox 1976 ---- Sei Chokh 1976 ---- Anandamela 1976 ---- Mombati 1976 ---- Chander Kachhakaachhi 1977 ---- Ananda Ashram 1975 ---- Sannyasi Raja 1977 ---- Sabyasachi 1977 ---- Rajbangsha 1977 ---- Bhola Moyra 1977 ---- Sister 1978 ---- Dui Purush 1978 ---- Bandi 1978 ---- Nishan 1978 ---- Dhanraj Tamang 1979 ---- Debdas 1979 ---- Srikanter Will 1979 ---- Samadhan 1979 ---- Brajabuli 1979 ---- Sunayani 1979 ---- Naba Diganta 1980 ---- Dui Prithibi 1980 ---- Raja Saheb 1980 ---- Pakhhiraj 1980 ---- Darpachurna 1980 ---- Aaro Ekjon 1980 ---- Ogo Badhu Sundari 1980 ---- Khana Barah 1980 ---- Pratishodh 1980 ---- Kalankini Kankabati 1980 ---- Suryasakkhi 1981 ---- Iman Kalyan.

My edit which i cannot do and was the last movie of an actor who was murdered medically.

Desh Premee (1982)-Uttam Kumar.Please unblock me! Mamta Dhody 19:12, 18 September 2009 (UTC)