User talk:ManUtdfan84
Speedy deletion nomination of Chelsea 2 v 3 Manchester United 2012
[edit]Hello ManUtdfan84,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Chelsea 2 v 3 Manchester United 2012 for deletion in response to your request.
If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 23:33, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
ManUtdfan84, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]Hi ManUtdfan84! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:21, 30 October 2012 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion nomination of Chelsea 2–3 Manchester United 2012
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Chelsea 2–3 Manchester United 2012 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.
– HonorTheKing (talk) 09:17, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
The article Chelsea 2–3 Manchester United 2012 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- A football match, with a bad result for the home side, and a complaint about the referee. We don't have articles about every match - only those with great importance - and this is a nine day wonder at the best...
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peridon (talk) 11:10, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Chelsea 2–3 Manchester United 2012 for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chelsea 2–3 Manchester United 2012 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chelsea 2–3 Manchester United 2012 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kinu t/c 17:21, 1 November 2012 (UTC)