User talk:Manghrat123

Hi Manghrat123! I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Polygnotus (talk) 16:50, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdul Mazid Photo (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdul Mazid Photo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:16, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Manghrat123! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:16, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Abdul Mazid Photo has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Abdul Mazid Photo. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:59, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! it does right here, "Abdul Majid, upazila chairman of Saturia in Manikganj" Manghrat123 (talk) 16:02, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://gyazo.com/855726b7934c288ea885a8f88ecb7c03 Manghrat123 (talk) 16:03, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh, and for the other one! https://gyazo.com/7bda86c552d45355c87ba38fd36a91aa

If you were to open up the news article you'd see his name and photo there.

It was the Upazilla parishad election of 2019. Manghrat123 (talk) 16:06, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Abdul Mazid Photo has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Abdul Mazid Photo. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:27, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

k Manghrat123 (talk) 16:29, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Abdul Mazid Photo has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Abdul Mazid Photo. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:35, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok Manghrat123 (talk) 16:43, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

removed what i deemed as excessive Manghrat123 (talk) 16:47, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of the quotes are required, Wikipedia articles are based on what independent, reliable sources report about a topic, there is little chance of the draft being accepted as it is VERY poorly sourced. Theroadislong (talk) 17:09, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

explain how, do you expect me to have 50 sources regarding him? these are all the news articles and government websites i can find about him. Manghrat123 (talk) 17:11, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder how mine's poorly sourced when there's additions like this to the website https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdul_Rauf_Khan Manghrat123 (talk) 17:17, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to place the references directly after the content that they support, that will help reviewers see if they are a notable person. Theroadislong (talk) 17:19, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, will do. Manghrat123 (talk) 17:19, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Rauf Khan is a very poor article and should probably be deleted as they do not pass WP:NPOLITICIAN see other poor quality articles exist. Theroadislong (talk) 17:21, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i'm good, have work dont need to read another article Manghrat123 (talk) 17:27, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Manghrat123. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:41, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your remark, made at User talk:DoubleGrazing, was not civil

You are required, as we all are, to maintain civility at all times. Rudeness, even trivial rudeness, does not have a place here. You cannot unsay anything on Wikipedia, and people do not unsee it. Please consider your behaviour with care. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:24, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this doesn't concern me.

Hope this helps. Manghrat123 (talk) 19:28, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you are to continue editing here then it needs to concern you. Do not continue your rudeness. I predict that continuing will mean you will lose your editing privileges here, (0.99 probability)) 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:34, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

do you abuse your power here since in real life you're nobody? Manghrat123 (talk) 19:36, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I neither have power here nor in real life. Please do not continue your abuse. I have not been, nor will I be, rude to you, whatever the provocation. I ask for the same civility from you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:40, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok, will leave u alone. Manghrat123 (talk) 19:45, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think you owe me an apology for your rudeness and abrupt behaviour. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:48, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no, im good I Will not be giving you an apology but I will leave you alone. Frankly, it's quite entitled of you to demand an apology from me dude. Manghrat123 (talk) 20:09, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then you reinforce your unpleasant behaviour. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:18, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

im good, I have stopped pestering you now stop pestering me. It's better for the both of us to just go along with our days. Manghrat123 (talk) 20:35, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:29, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:38, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdul Mazid Photo (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You have all your references in a rush at the end. Please read and implement WP:REFB and WP:CITE.

All inline links should be removed, please, and turned into references if appropriate, Wikilinks, or external links in a section so named. See Wikipedia:External links. There should be no links pointing to external sources until those in the 'References' section (with the exception of one optional link in any infobox).

There is little point in reviewing ths further until you solve the immediate problems. Hwever,m I can say with complete confidence that the huge quotations you have included are not appropriate. Wikipedia is not interested in what Photo has to say. Wikipedia is only interested in what others say about him. You have work to do.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdul Mazid Photo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:30, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:27, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 21:21, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]