User talk:Manlyboost3000

Welcome!

Hi Manlyboost3000! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 21:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I hope my genealogical research can be put to some use. Manlyboost3000 (talk) 21:58, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding a person without sources!

Stop adding this person on Wikipedia. Wikipedia deals in notability as established by reliable sources especially with Living persons who need to meet these guidelines Wikipedia is not a genealogy website. Also, if you are or know the person you keep trying to add, see WP:COI. If you continue to add this person without subjects, you will be referred for Administrative action which can include loss of editing privileges. Slywriter (talk) 00:09, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest you respond, otherwise I will assume by continuing your disruptive editing that you have no interest in following Wikipedia policies. Slywriter (talk) 00:11, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gathering sources. Manlyboost3000 (talk) 00:19, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How is providing extra information considered a 'disruptive edit'? When I have actual physical sources and archived documents online from the library of Shrewsbury?. Me saying 'gathering sources' was saying I'm currently working on how to add these as there are a lot of them.. not much IT knoledge.In all my 72 years I have never come across such bull. Absolutely appalled. Freedom an all that ey. Manlyboost3000 (talk) 00:43, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is you are providing zero sources relevant to the subject that you are placing all over Wikipedia. We need verifiable material that shows the subject is actually notable. Otherwise, it just looks like you are spamming a non-notable person. You have been doing it for months without showing any evidence the person has a claim.

Now if you wish to be unblocked, you need to follow the directions in Bbb23's post below and show the admins you understand Wikipedia policy. Slywriter (talk) 01:03, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sir Jakob Edwardes-Iddon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sir Jakob Edwardes-Iddon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Slywriter (talk) 00:10, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gathering sources

Gathering sources Manlyboost3000 (talk) 00:15, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 00:26, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jakob Edwardes-Iddon

Hello, Manlyboost3000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jakob Edwardes-Iddon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jakob Edwardes-Iddon

Hello, Manlyboost3000. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jakob Edwardes-Iddon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:02, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]