User talk:Mannu098765

October 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you recently removed content from Meghwal without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 18:11, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Meghwal, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. jp×g 19:26, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Meghwal, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 10:47, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Meghwal. Parksfan1955 (talk) 11:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Meghwal.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:10, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]