Jump to content

User talk:Mannyadebayo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Mannyadebayo, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Mannyadebayo/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:27, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Mannyadebayo/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:27, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 15:29, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Mannyadebayo, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:29, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 78.26 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:56, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Mannyadebayo. You have new messages at 78.26's talk page.
Message added 16:12, 23 September 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:12, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again, per above. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:16, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:RCCG The Lord's Cedar, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Resubmitting this draft after it has been declined repeatedly is tendentious and may result in a block. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:24, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RCCG The Lord's Cedar (September 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 17:25, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your Church Submission

[edit]

If you really think that your church is notable in a way that the tens of thousands of churches in North America are not notable, please do not try to discuss it with me. Not every church is notable. If the real purpose of your article was to describe a notable church to the readers of the encyclopedia, you wouldn't need to include the schedule of its services, which is only to use Wikipedia to encourage people to attend your church, which is not what Wikipedia is for. Please go to the Teahouse and ask for advice, which will probably not be encouraging. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:37, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:03, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RCCG The Lord's Cedar (October 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 03:11, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]