User talk:Manustella

I was thinking there should be a page for those guys and put everything there????

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Michael Omidi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dr. Michael Omidi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Keystoner idin (speak) 19:03, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 1-800-GET-THIN. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MsFionnuala (talk) 01:27, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:3RR - your continued unexplained deletion of sourced content at 1-800-GET-THIN is liable to result in you being blocked from editing. If you think there is a problem with the material, discussit on the article talk page. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:31, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. SmartSE (talk) 18:17, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you following Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Manustella (which you should have been made aware of) which showed you used a sockpuppet to revert the same material you had been edit warring over. This means you broke WP:3RR. SmartSE (talk) 18:19, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Manustella. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 17:43, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]