User talk:ManymerrymenmakingmuchmoneyinthemonthofMay

Hi ManymerrymenmakingmuchmoneyinthemonthofMay, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.

Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Good luck, and have fun. --Legosock ^(talk) 00:47, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Legosock ^(talk) 00:47, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked your too long user name[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because of concerns that the chosen username may not meet our username policy.

This is often not a reflection on the user, and you are encouraged to choose a new account name which does meet our guidelines and are invited to contribute to Wikipedia under an appropriate username. If you feel this block was made in error, you may quickly and easily appeal it - see below.

Our username policy provides guidance on selecting your username. In brief, usernames should not be offensive, disruptive, promotional, related to a 'real-world' group or organization, confusing, or misleading.

If you have already made edits and wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name you may request a change in username which is quick and easy. To do so, please follow these directions:

Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. This is possible because even when you are blocked, you can still edit your own talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note, you may only request a name that is not already in use. The account is created upon acceptance – do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change since we can far easier allocate your new name to you, if it is not yet used. Usernames that have already been taken are listed here. For more information, please visit Wikipedia:Changing username.

Last, the automated software systems that prevent vandalism may have been activated, which can cause new account creation to be blocked also. If you have not acted in a deliberately inappropriate manner, please let us know if this happens, and we will deactivate the block as soon as possible. You may also appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below or emailing the administrator who blocked you.

Sorry, cut it down. Bearian (talk) 01:24, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ManymerrymenmakingmuchmoneyinthemonthofMay (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I searched for "long" and "length" and can't find anything in that policy which says I can't have a long name. This phrase, as odd as it may seems, has very personal meaning for me.

Decline reason:

Usernames may not be confusing, and excessively long usernames are confusing. Therefore, choose a shorter username that is more memorable and less confusing, and use the unblock-un template as described in the orange box above to request a username change. Thank you. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 02:48, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well, I thought I did use the template, and considering how one person single-handedly booted me based on an interpretation of policy involving STUFF THE POLICY DOES NOT SAY, I can't see a lot of reason to take time to learn anything else about Wikipedia. Just because you think a long name is confusing doesn't mean that's true. Does policy say you're supposed to block first and ask questions later? Does policy say block people instead of suggesting that they're in violation of policy and giving them a chance to tow the line on their own? ManymerrymenmakingmuchmoneyinthemonthofMay (talk) 02:52, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I object to this user remaining blocked[edit]

This user's name has the same number of characters as User:Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The. And, much as we abbreviate that username to "Tony" in conversation, we can come up with something to abbreviate this one to. --Random832 (contribs) 02:54, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

via con dios. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 02:57, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For comparison

ManymerrymenmakingmuchmoneyinthemonthofMay
Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The
Can't sleep, clown will eat me
Namewatcher bot limit:234567890123456789

--Random832 (contribs) 02:59, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly object to this username an unnecessarily confusing, please request a change to someone more easily read. Those names have spaces and CAPS making them intelligible at a quick glance. MBisanz ^talk 03:03, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That said[edit]

You really should probably change your name to something just a bit shorter. --Random832 (contribs) 03:03, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Abbreviated signature. 8M (talk) 03:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How appropriate was that?[edit]

I still want to know how appropriate it was for someone to block me WITHOUT FIRST SAYING ONE WORD TO ME? Is that how Wikipedia does things? Really? 8M (talk) 03:06, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the exact wording of the policy, it probably was a little hasty to block you without discussion. While in a lot (most) cases of username violations, it is entirely appropriate to block without prior warning, I think that in your case some discussion was probably called for. Trusilver 03:10, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) It seems you were blocked because of Wikipedia:Username policy#Confusing usernames. Lengthy names fit under this category of username blocks. There usually isn't any discussion with the editor on the matter. He or she is just requested to either create a new account or request a name change at Wikipedia:Changing username. I suggest you consider changing your username to something shorter. It will awfully difficult for an editor to try to remember your entire username, say if they are trying to search for your edits at Special:Contributions. Also, thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia so far! :) Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 03:15, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If blocks aren't usually discussed with people first, it's kind of hard to feel like sticking around here. This was a seriously unpleasant introduction. 8M (talk) 03:19, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. For what it's worth I thought the name was quite amusing. Orderinchaos 03:32, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Given that you had made a number of encyclopedic contributions, you probably should have been asked to request a username change or create a new account, instead of being blocked. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 03:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently there's no "probably" to it. As someone mentioned on your talk page (which I repeat not for you but for anyone else), the policy says, "confusing usernames are unlike the disallowed usernames above because a confusing username cannot be so inappropriate on its own that it requires an immediate block without at least an attempt at substantive discussion." 8M (talk) 06:11, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked your name, not your account, by using a "soft block." You were still able to edit your talk page, request help, and email others on the web site, including me. I did this because it was inappropriately long and confusing, and in violation of our rule that user names not be confusing. I am sorry that it appeared to be rude, but your actions had the probability of disrupting this site. Please accept my apologies for not contacting you first, and enjoy editing here at Wikipedia. Bearian (talk) 14:32, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not simply rude. You violated policy while calling a kettle black. 8M (talk) 16:59, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

I am intending to try to have policy modified to stop this sort of thing happening. You should be treated more nicely. You should be asked to contribute to a discussion on the appropriateness of your username. Such a discussion should take place, unless your username fits clearly defined criteria for speedy blocking. The template slapped on your talk page should be mor personable. What do you think? This sort of thing happens a lot, but you are unusual in that you are protesting about it. I’m curous. What knowledge of, and interaction with Wikipedia, or other wikis, did you have before last week? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:54, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some bits of anonymous editing here and there, fixing a few things that grated me while reading articles, but people I know in real life who edit Wikipedia all the time encouraged me to get a user name if I wanted to do anything more than that. 8M (talk) 16:46, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have proposed a bright line test at a maximum number of charcters at 42. There was formerly a consensus that more than 40 was too long, but now it is left up to the discretion of administrators. Bearian (talk) 15:34, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

42 is the ultimate answer, of course. 8M (talk) 16:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But by the addition of yet more characters, I think the username is less problematic. ie. Many Merry Men Making Much Money in the Month of May. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I tend to agree, but right now people are discussing a 42-character limit, so I'm kind of limited without outright bowing to people's arbitrary snippiness just because they don't like the name (even though some people do!). I might capitalize all the Ms. MMMMMMMM (talk) 01:01, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice[edit]

Seeing your MMMMMMMM sig made me click on your userpage, and I have to say your name is AWESOME. Mine is just so boring, I apparently wasn't thinking creatively when I created my account. Anyways, I'm sorry that there was so much controversy surrounding your account creation. Here's a cookie, maybe it will help some. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 00:13, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

J.delanoy ^gabs _adds has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thank you very much! In light of these well wishes, the signature goes from 8M back to eight Ms. MMMMMMMM (talk) 01:01, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I like your name better when it is all run together like that, rather than adding spaces, because it makes me want to say it really fast in my mind when I'm reading it, and then I realize what it actually is. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 12:51, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the cookie![edit]

And it was my pleasure. Continued good Wiki'ing! --Tenebrae (talk) 13:13, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"A U.S."[edit]

The reason I reverted it (once by the way) was because I was unaware that you do not use "an" before acronyms. But you use "an" before vowel sounds, thats why its "an hour" not "a hour." Rau's Speak Page 20:09, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But any acronym starting with a "u" has a vowel sound at the beginning. I'm confused. Rau's Speak Page 01:47, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, yes English is my native language, but I am also still in high school. I just always figured the letter started with a vowel sound. Rau's Speak Page 18:18, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

raw 42[edit]

Wouldn't it be hard for the software to limit a signature to 42 characters when people use fonts, italics, colors, and whatnot to jazz up their sigs? Doesn't all the language for those goodies have to go in the same box under the user's preferences? Software could limit registration name, sure, but the signature? MMMMMMMM (talk) 01:32, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I believe there already is a limitation on the that. (Just not to 42.) - jc37 01:54, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Canvassing[edit]

How is that not canvassing? MMMMMMMM (talk) 01:33, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's actually been discussed at WT:RFA. Though I think it's pretty much resolved now. - jc37 04:09, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- I think you'll want to take a look at this discussion and Lady Aleena's response. Thanks. Acalamari 16:03, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Metropolis film: cost[edit]

Hi, my ^{[dubious – discuss]} tag for the 200 mil USD is there for a reason. Just because a film critic thinks he knows how much a German Reichsmark would be worth nowadays does't make his claim reliable. Here's the maths, from the discussion page, copied here for your convenience: (Isn't that nice of me?)

1 RM (1926) ^= 3,32 EUR (2000) (Note: this is a generous conversion (from the discussion, sourced). In 2004 the German Federal Bank estimated a conversion of 1 RM ^≈ 3.00 EUR [1])

1 EUR (2000) ^≈ 1,00 USD (2000)

1 USD (2000) ^≈ 1,20 USD (2007) (Consumer value diff., according to US Dollar)

So: 1 RM(1926) ^≈ 4 USD (2007)

and 7 mil RM ^≈ 28 mil USD (2007)

That's an estimate, of course, but far away from the 200 mil claim. The RM-EUR conversion cited is the most generous I could find for those years. Even the seven million RM are inconsistent, with sources citing 6 or even 5.6 million.

If you want to add something, you are invited to the discussion on the Metropolis talk page. I will now re-add the tag and remove the source, which is clearly BS.

Hope to hear from you, -- megA (talk) 15:26, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does this really make a difference? -- megA (talk) 16:03, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Subset (band)[edit]

The article Subset (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TallNapoleon (talk) 06:24, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dermatology[edit]

Any interest in dermatology? If so, we are always looking for more help at the Dermatology task force, particularly with the ongoing Bolognia push. I can e-mail you the login information if you like? There is still a lot of potential for many new articles and redirects. ---kilbad (talk) 18:16, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The OneUps[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The OneUps requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 10:46, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, ManymerrymenmakingmuchmoneyinthemonthofMay. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, ManymerrymenmakingmuchmoneyinthemonthofMay. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jade Ramsey[edit]

Hello, ManymerrymenmakingmuchmoneyinthemonthofMay. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jade Ramsey, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jade Ramsey[edit]

Hello, ManymerrymenmakingmuchmoneyinthemonthofMay. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jade Ramsey".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:08, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]